The NSA is Wiretapping YOU and ME, Personally

This guy’s state­ment is just too good to hide. Every per­son in the US needs to pay atten­tion to this issue. Don’t just let it wan­der off the head­lines. It is very important.

Not an AT&T cus­tomer? It does­n’t mat­ter. Inter­net traf­fic is rout­ed across switch­es and such in a man­ner that does­n’t care who owns what. That’s part of the beau­ty of it. It also allows the peo­ple who own the biggest pieces of the back­bone to give access to any­one they like, such as Bush­co, or even anoth­er gov­ern­ment if they had such leanings.

Wire­tap Whistle­blow­er’s Statement
By 12:25 PM Apr, 07, 2006
For­mer AT&T tech­ni­cian Mark Klein has come for­ward to sup­port the EFF’s law­suit against AT&T for its alleged com­plic­i­ty in the NSA’s elec­tron­ic surveillance.

Full sto­ry: Ex-AT&T Work­er Tells Of NSA Op

State­ment: Mark Klein, April 6, 2006
My back­ground: For 22 and 1/2 years I worked as an AT&T tech­ni­cian, first in New York and then in California.

What I observed first-hand:

In 2002, when I was work­ing in an AT&T office in San Fran­cis­co, the site man­ag­er told me to expect a vis­it from a Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Agency agent, who was to inter­view a man­age­ment-lev­el tech­ni­cian for a spe­cial job. The agent came, and by chance I met him and direct­ed him to the appro­pri­ate people.

In Jan­u­ary 2003, I, along with oth­ers, toured the AT&T cen­tral office on Fol­som Street in San Fran­cis­co — actu­al­ly three floors of an SBC building. 

There I saw a new room being built adja­cent to the 4ESS switch room where the pub­lic’s phone calls are rout­ed. I learned that the per­son whom the NSA inter­viewed for the secret job was the per­son work­ing to install equip­ment in this room. The reg­u­lar tech­ni­cian work force was not allowed in the room.

In Octo­ber 2003, the com­pa­ny trans­ferred me to the San Fran­cis­co build­ing to over­see the World­net Inter­net room, which includ­ed large routers, racks of modems for cus­tomers’ dial-in ser­vices, and oth­er equip­ment. I was respon­si­ble for trou­bleshoot­ing prob­lems on the fiber optic cir­cuits and installing new circuits.

While doing my job, I learned that fiber optic cables from the secret room were tap­ping into the World­net cir­cuits by split­ting off a por­tion of the light sig­nal. I saw this in a design doc­u­ment avail­able to me, enti­tled “Study Group 3, LGX/Splitter Wiring, San Fran­cis­co” dat­ed Dec. 10, 2002. I also saw design doc­u­ments dat­ed Jan. 13, 2004 and Jan. 24, 2003, which instruct­ed tech­ni­cians on con­nect­ing some of the already in-ser­vice cir­cuits to the “split­ter” cab­i­net, which diverts some of the light sig­nal to the secret room. The cir­cuits list­ed were the Peer­ing Links, which con­nect World­net with oth­er net­works and hence the whole coun­try, as well as the rest of the world.

One of the doc­u­ments list­ed the equip­ment installed in the secret room, and this list includ­ed a Narus STA 6400, which is a “Seman­tic Traf­fic Ana­lyz­er”. The Narus STA tech­nol­o­gy is known to be used par­tic­u­lar­ly by gov­ern­ment intel­li­gence agen­cies because of its abil­i­ty to sift through large amounts of data look­ing for pre­pro­grammed tar­gets. The com­pa­ny’s adver­tis­ing boasts that its tech­nol­o­gy “cap­tures com­pre­hen­sive cus­tomer usage data … and trans­forms it into action­able infor­ma­tion.… (It) pro­vides com­plete vis­i­bil­i­ty for all inter­net applications.”

My job required me to con­nect new cir­cuits to the “split­ter” cab­i­net and get them up and run­ning. While work­ing on a par­tic­u­lar­ly dif­fi­cult one with a tech­ni­cian back East, I learned that oth­er such “split­ter” cab­i­nets were being installed in oth­er cities, includ­ing Seat­tle, San Jose, Los Ange­les and San Diego.

What is the sig­nif­i­cance and why is it impor­tant to bring these facts to light?

Based on my under­stand­ing of the con­nec­tions and equip­ment at issue, it appears the NSA is capa­ble of con­duct­ing what amounts to vac­u­um-clean­er sur­veil­lance of all the data cross­ing the inter­net — whether that be peo­ples’ e‑mail, web surf­ing or any oth­er data.

Giv­en the pub­lic debate about the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of the Bush admin­is­tra­tion’s spy­ing on U.S. cit­i­zens with­out obtain­ing a FISA war­rant, I think it is crit­i­cal that this infor­ma­tion be brought out into the open, and that the Amer­i­can peo­ple be told the truth about the extent of the admin­is­tra­tion’s war­rant­less sur­veil­lance prac­tices, par­tic­u­lar­ly as it relates to the internet.

Despite what we are hear­ing, and con­sid­er­ing the pub­lic track record of this admin­is­tra­tion, I sim­ply do not believe their claims that the NSA’s spy­ing pro­gram is real­ly lim­it­ed to for­eign com­mu­ni­ca­tions or is oth­er­wise con­sis­tent with the NSA’s char­ter or with FISA. And unlike the con­tro­ver­sy over tar­get­ed wire­taps of indi­vid­u­als’ phone calls, this poten­tial spy­ing appears to be applied whole­sale to all sorts of inter­net com­mu­ni­ca­tions of count­less citizens.

Cur­rent Mood: 🙁rest­less
Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top