Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and the Death of Intimacy

From time to time I meet peo­ple who say they are in “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) rela­tion­ships. Their spouse has sup­pos­ed­ly agreed that they may have out­side rela­tion­ships, but the spouse does­n’t want to know any­thing about their oth­er sig­nif­i­cant oth­ers (OSOs) or what they do togeth­er. They don’t want to know when dates hap­pen, they don’t want to meet the OSOs, they don’t want to know who is hav­ing sex with whom, nothing.

DADT agree­ments seem to be most com­mon when a polyamorous per­son is part­nered with a monog­a­mous per­son, but they cer­tain­ly aren’t lim­it­ed to that sit­u­a­tion. I usu­al­ly hear about DADT from men who I feel are try­ing to get away with some­thing (that is, they seem to be actu­al­ly cheat­ing on their part­ners, rather than polyamorous)—they show all the signs of sneak­ing around.

But some­times a per­son will show up at poly events wear­ing a wed­ding band, say­ing that they have a DADT arrange­ment with their spouse. If the per­son keeps com­ing to events, the ring is usu­al­ly gone in a few months, and we hear that there’s a divorce in the works.

What­ev­er the rea­son, I view DADT as a major warn­ing sign that the pri­ma­ry rela­tion­ship is not healthy, and that we may well be hear­ing its death rat­tle. It is fre­quent­ly used when the monog­a­mous part­ner does not, in fact, want their part­ner to have oth­er rela­tion­ships but does not feel secure enough to demand monogamy from that part­ner. It is almost always a com­pro­mise arrived at when one part­ner does want oth­er rela­tion­ships and one wants a closed relationship.

The main prob­lem that I see with DADT is that it kills inti­ma­cy. It pre­vents full and hon­est com­mu­ni­ca­tion between part­ners. Inti­ma­cy can only occur when there is total hon­esty. When cer­tain top­ics are off-lim­its, there are bar­ri­ers between you. Most peo­ple do not live strict­ly com­part­men­tal­ized lives.

For instance, Jamie is real­ly look­ing for­ward to their week­ly lunch with their sweet­ie, Leslie. A cri­sis comes up, neces­si­tat­ing an urgent meet­ing. Jamie has to can­cel the lunch plans, leav­ing them out of sorts. When Jamie gets home that night, they can’t explain their mood to their spouse Tay­lor. Tay­lor knows that some­thing is both­er­ing Jamie, and they want to know what it is—but they may be reluc­tant to ask because they don’t want to know about it if it has any­thing to do with Leslie. There are walls between Jamie and Tay­lor, and slow­ly the with­hold­ing spreads to oth­er areas of their lives. DADT is not sus­tain­able in the long run and can lead to the cou­ple becom­ing room­mates more than partners.

DADT can also present safe­ty issues. If Jamie learns that Leslie has decid­ed to stop using con­doms with their oth­er sweetie(s), their rela­tion­ship with Leslie presents a greater health risk to them and to Tay­lor than it did when Leslie was using bar­ri­ers. Jamie needs to dis­close that increased risk to Tay­lor. If they have a DADT agree­ment, they’re like­ly to be reluc­tant to bring up the issue.

True inti­ma­cy requires true hon­esty. True hon­esty is com­plete, with­out hold­ing any­thing back. I can’t imag­ine sac­ri­fic­ing inti­ma­cy to avoid dis­com­fort. Why would you do it?

I’m the first to admit that I don’t have the One True Way to Do Poly, so obvi­ous­ly, there may be peo­ple for whom DADT works. I just haven’t seen it myself.

8 thoughts on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and the Death of Intimacy

  1. I enjoyed your col­umn. I am in a sit­u­a­tion that is open (we are hon­est with each oth­er), and where recent­ly one of his part­ners in anoth­er city has moved to town, lit­er­al­ly into his neigh­bor­hood. Their arrange­ment has been DADT for 12 years. And I did­n’t ques­tion it. I assessed it much as your analysis–that I per­son­al­ly would want to “know” things that impact me, such as health risks, and I see the sit­u­a­tion as one that under­mines intimacy–if I refuse to get to know who you real­ly are/what you’re real­ly doing, how can my feel­ings for “you” be valid or that I hon­est­ly accept you? So, my arrange­ment has been that I try to be respect­ful of oth­er part­ners in my ques­tions, and my part­ner is able to tell me what­ev­er he is com­fort­able shar­ing, but MUST tell any­thing that could put me at risk.

    What has con­cerned me about this lat­est devel­op­ment is that it seems to vio­late the “DA” por­tion of the deal. If I say I don’t want to know about your oth­er part­ners, but them move, lit­er­al­ly, around the cor­ner from where you live, then my actions and words aren’t aligned. Fur­ther ear­ly in our rela­tion­ship we had STI screen­ings to deter­mine if we could stop using con­doms. His test came up with a prob­lem­at­ic pos­i­tive result that he then had to share with his DADT partner–out of pure eth­i­cal con­sid­er­a­tions. When he told her about the pos­i­tive result, she asked why he’d been test­ed. Again, ask­ing some­one why they were screened for an STI, when you say you don’t want to know if they have oth­er part­ners does not appear to rep­re­sent align­ment between actions and words.

    I’ve been research­ing this because her move to his neigh­bor­hood, from a near­by city, has now made prob­lems with the DADT sit­u­a­tion they had previously–which was more eas­i­ly kept when they were liv­ing far­ther apart. I had my own thoughts on the sit­u­a­tion, but want­ed oth­er perspectives.

    Nei­ther of us, he nor I, have had much time to process this news, as she only announced her move to him less than a week ago. But his imme­di­ate reac­tion has been very dif­fer­ent than mine. I believe the effort to be dis­creet should not include pro­tect­ing his part­ner from her­self. That is, I don’t see why *our* arrange­ment needs to change. She made the deci­sion to live with­in such close prox­im­i­ty, and she there­fore has exposed her­self to a greater risk of find­ing out about his oth­er com­ings and goings. That’s on her, and he has no oblig­a­tion to re-arrange his life for her, but has sug­gest­ed we may no longer be able to meet at his home for our dates. I see her behav­ior as “ask­ing.” And I believe that while he should­n’t flaunt the infor­ma­tion to her, he’s not under an oblig­a­tion to take extra­or­di­nary mea­sures to pro­tect her from find­ing things she has tak­en extra­or­di­nary mea­sures to find. In oth­er words, DADT means you don’t check your SO’s cell phone. That’s *ask­ing*. My solu­tion would be to note that if you check the cell phone, you may not like what you find–and if you hon­est­ly don’t want to know, then don’t check the cell phone. His response seems to be “since you’re going to check the cell phone, I guess I need to buy anoth­er cell phone and find a way to keep it hid­den from you.”

    That to me is above-and-beyond DADT. But he said as well he does­n’t want to jeop­ar­dize what he has with her–and so I have to *hear* that, and it seems that I don’t have much option oth­er than to walk in this case, and be glad I only spent a year invest­ed in this so far.

    Since he has­n’t had a lot of time to process it, and I won’t be con­nect­ing with him for about a week, I’m tak­ing the time to just check oth­er points of view and research this idea, and think/rethink things, so that when I do see him lat­er I can be clear on what is/is not accept­able to me. If his atti­tudes remain what they are as of our last/first con­ver­sa­tion about this, then I have to move along. But it’s pos­si­ble he was sim­ply react­ing to new infor­ma­tion and had­n’t processed it ful­ly him­self. If he can adjust his view to cre­ate more rea­son­able bound­aries between what’s on him and what’s on her as far as infor­ma­tion expo­sure, then I may be sur­prised and there may be a future, but to me even the idea of her mov­ing into the neigh­bor­hood is sat­u­rat­ed with dys­func­tion, and so I’m not hope­ful. I hon­est­ly believe my next con­ver­sa­tion with him will be my last and he can then focus on his new neigh­bor and try his luck find­ing part­ners who don’t mind being treat­ed like sub­or­di­nates to her, rather than peers/partners.

    But want­ed to say yours was one of a hand­ful over lev­el-head­ed per­spec­tives on this issue that I’ve come across. Thanks for post­ing it.

  2. My only request was if he became sex­u­al­ly active with oth­er women, that we use con­doms togeth­er. I nev­er asked him to use them with oth­er women, that was a deci­sion between them. That way, what­ev­er deci­sions they made did­n’t impact the deci­sion we made. He was upset to have to go back to using con­doms after 20 years of mar­riage, but it was my only request regard­ing sex.
    So our DADT should­n’t have had the “health” draw­backs you men­tioned. In terms of inti­ma­cy, that’s just bull­shit. I have a deep con­nec­tion with my mom with­out know­ing all the details of my par­ents’ sex lives. I have very close friend­ships with­out hav­ing blow-by-blow descrip­tions of their sex lives. Inti­ma­cy cov­ers so much more than talk­ing about who’s doing what to whom. Peo­ple leave out details of large sec­tions of their lives with­out it dam­ag­ing the rela­tion­ship. I’d be will­ing to bet you don’t know every lit­tle detail about every per­son you’re close to. It’s sim­ply not nec­es­sary to know every­thing in order to build inti­ma­cy with some­one. What is nec­es­sary is trust and respect. Nei­ther of which is shown when you demand to share inti­mate details with some­one who does­n’t want to hear them.

    1. Hi Angel. This would be much sim­pler if you would keep your com­ments to one arti­cle, rather than con­tin­u­ing your thoughts from one arti­cle to the next. In any case, I’m glad you came to an arrange­ment that did­n’t have that draw­back. And I think you know that the kind of inti­ma­cy one has with a par­ent or friend is entire­ly dif­fer­ent than that which one has in a rela­tion­ship that includes sex. Bring­ing up the oth­er kinds of rela­tion­ships is a red her­ring. Appar­ent­ly your agree­ment did­n’t work out, or you would­n’t have writ­ten the com­ment on the oth­er article.

    2. @Angel: I don’t think it’s about “need­ing” to know every­thing about a per­son. It’s about hav­ing some parts of the per­son lit­er­al­ly off-lim­its. That is, I may not need to know every­thing about my friends or rel­a­tives to be inti­mate­ly asso­ci­at­ed with them–but they are open to tell me any­thing they would like to share. We don’t have bound­aries around what they are or are not allowed to come to me and share. When I lit­er­al­ly say to some­one “I don’t want to know about X aspect of your life–don’t tell me about it,” I am reject­ing a part of them–of who they are. And sex­u­al expression–how peo­ple inter­act sex­u­al­ly with others–is an inte­gral part of a per­son. If I tell my gay child, for exam­ple, “I don’t want to hear about your gay affairs, because I don’t want to know about your gay stuff, because I can’t deal with it,” I’m lit­er­al­ly telling my child that I reject a major part of who they are.

      1. THIS!! This com­ment is every­thing. If I tell my part­ner I want DADT, I am reject­ing a part of who they are and telling them that part is bad, that they are wrong, and that they can­not feel safe to share in the hap­pi­ness, sad­ness, joy, and pain with regards to their var­i­ous para­mours. If a para­mour is ask­ing for DADT, my obser­va­tion is that they want to pre­tend to have a monog­a­mous or at the very least closed rela­tion­ship (V, or tri­ad, etc) in their head because they real­ly aren’t poly or they are unwill­ing to unpack the dis­com­fort of all the emo­tions one feels when their para­mour choos­es to spend time with anoth­er (para­mour or meta­mour). Stick­ing one’s head in the sand does­n’t alter reality.

  3. I am in an open mar­riage. Mar­ried for 8 years. My wife and I love sep­a­rate but love each oth­er very very much. She has a monogamish rela­tion­ship and I have fall­en in love with anoth­er women who lives far away and also has anoth­er partner.

    I have been open for years, but my love for this oth­er women is intox­i­cat­ing and the long­ing is painful at times. That said — every­thing is amaz­ing and she longs for and miss­es me too.

    With my wife, our com­mu­ni­ca­tion style pret­ty much full dis­clo­sure. Though she Does­n’t care to know about lit­tle hookups and things. Though in the right con­text, I let her know stuff and we laugh about it. All good there. She knows I am in love with this oth­er women — who also hap­pens to be her friend. All good there.

    The prob­lem is the pain of want­i­ng to be with my lover.… I feel lost at times!!! With just pure long­ing. We have a vaca­tion planned, we talk for hours… and still I want more.

    She is in anoth­er rela­tion­ship and tech­ni­cal­ly she is hav­ing an affair. I don’t real­ly involve myself and try to just sup­port her in what­ev­er she feels is right for her.

    Now… the idea of open­ing myself to oth­er peo­ple (in addi­tion to my wife and lover), makes me feel bet­ter. It makes the pain hurt less.

    The idea of telling her about it is a devis­tat­ing one. I would hate to ini­ti­ate a dis­tur­bance between her and her love for me. She does­n’t need to know either. 

    The fact also remains, that I want her so bad, I would explore monogamy even. With pleasure. 

    I believe in free­dom and she should always do what­ev­er she wish­es. She does­n’t need to tell me. Though if she want­ed to — she could also. I can han­dle it.

    what’s hard­er to han­dle is the idea of telling her about oth­ers.… espe­cial­ly when I am most­ly inter­est­ed in see­ing oth­er peo­ple only to keep some lev­el of cool and san­i­ty.… it’s almost for her I am doing it in a strange and twist­ed way. It’s for her because it’s the only thing that seems to keep me from cling­ing and attach­ing to her.

    The last point is, can you be tru­ely free and main­tain full disclosure?

  4. I don’t ful­ly fol­low some of your com­ment, I’m afraid. You seem to have free­dom, and with the excep­tion of your lover’s affair, dis­clo­sure. In my expe­ri­ence, those are not incompatible.

    If you’re say­ing that you want to be with your lover to the exclu­sion of all oth­ers — you men­tion pos­si­bly explor­ing monogamy — then tell your lover that, and see what hap­pens. Be aware, though, that if she’s will­ing to have one affair, she’ll be will­ing to have others. 

    As for your oth­er lovers, it is unfair to them that you see them only “keep me from cling­ing and attach­ing to her” (your lover, I take it).

  5. This was an inter­est­ing per­spec­tive, but as some­one who has been research­ing the sub­ject a lot late­ly I can’t help but feel that there is an obnox­ious­ly evan­gel­i­cal tone to a lot of poly/open advo­ca­cy. My wife and I have been strug­gling with the pos­si­bil­i­ty of open­ing things up, she wants it more than I do, and what I found most off-putting about the con­cept was not that my wife would have sex with oth­er peo­ple on occa­sion, but that I’d have oth­er peo­ple and rela­tion­ships invad­ing our men­tal and/or phys­i­cal space and our fam­i­ly (we have two small kids). I don’t want a dif­fer­ent “lifestyle.” I don’t want to hear about some stranger, his wife, her lover, etc. I love my wife and want her to be hap­py, I don’t care about the oth­er peo­ple and don’t want to spend two sec­onds of my emo­tion­al or men­tal ener­gy on them. And the thing is, she does­n’t want that either. She wants fun on the side, a release and that’s it, a lit­tle explo­ration before she gets old. I know that does­n’t guar­an­tee feel­ings don’t come in, but we decid­ed we would be hon­est with each oth­er if they do, and fig­ure out what to do with it then, but until that hap­pens, we’d rather not know. There’s a rea­son that for cen­turies peo­ple had “under­stand­ings” and “arrange­ments” but that open mar­riage and poly are much new­er and seem more preva­lent among peo­ple whose lean­ings are already away from non-tra­di­tion­al mar­riage and fam­i­ly. Great for you, but stop being so preachy to every­one else. I want my wife to have fun and not have to think about it too much. I don’t want to deal with oth­er peo­ple’s crap. I want some­thing com­part­men­tal­ized, I know that’s not 100% pos­si­ble but I’d rather aim for that. It’s ok for peo­ple to have some space to them­selves, not every­thing has to be 100% shared. If any­thing, I think it’s more self-indul­gent of a non-monog­a­mous per­son to *expect* a monog­a­mous per­son to share in their experiences.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top