Very Astute

Fati­ma Mernissi and the Size 6 Harem

Size 6: The West­ern Wom­en’s Harem.
from Scheherazade Goes West by Fati­ma Mernissi, a Moroc­can fem­i­nist and pro­fes­sor at Mohammed V Uni­ver­si­ty, who grew up in an enclosed harem, unable to leave except once a week when she could walk, escort­ed and veiled, to the Ham­mam, or Turk­ish baths.

It was dur­ing my unsuc­cess­ful attempt to buy a cot­ton skirt in an Amer­i­can depart­ment store that I was told my hips were too large to fit into a size 6. That dis­tress­ing expe­ri­ence made me real­ize how the image of beau­ty in the West can hurt and humil­i­ate a woman as much as the veil does when enforced by the state police in extrem­ist nations such as Iran, Afghanistan, or Sau­di Ara­bia. Yes, that day I stum­bled onto one of the keys to the enig­ma of pas­sive beau­ty in West­ern harem fan­tasies. The ele­gant salesla­dy in the Amer­i­can store looked at me with­out mov­ing from her desk and said that she had no skirt my size. “In this whole big store, there is no skirt for me?” I said. “You are jok­ing.” I felt very sus­pi­cious and thought that she just might be too tired to help me. I could under­stand that. But then the sales­woman added a con­de­scend­ing judg­ment, which sound­ed to me like Imam fat­wa. It left no room for discussion:

“You are too big!” she said.

“I am too big com­pared to what?” I asked, look­ing at her intent­ly, because I real­ized that I was fac­ing a crit­i­cal cul­tur­al gap here.

“Com­pared to a size 6,” came the salesla­dy’s reply.

Her voice had a clear-cut edge to it that is typ­i­cal of those who enforce reli­gious laws. “Size 4 and 6 are the norm,” she went on, encour­aged by my bewil­dered look. “Deviant sizes such as the one you need can be bought in spe­cial stores.”

That was the first time I had ever heard such non­sense about my size. In the Moroc­can streets, men’s flat­ter­ing com­ments regard­ing my par­tic­u­lar­ly gen­er­ous hips have for decades led me to believe that the entire plan­et shared their con­vic­tions. It is true that with advanc­ing age, I have been hear­ing few­er and few­er flat­ter­ing com­ments when walk­ing around in the med­i­na, and some­times the silence around me in the bazaars is deaf­en­ing. But since my face has nev­er met with the local beau­ty stan­dards, and I have often had to defend myself against remarks such as zirafa (giraffe), because of my long neck, I learned long ago not to rely too much on the out­side world for my sense of self-worth. In fact, para­dox­i­cal­ly, as I dis­cov­ered when I went to Rabat as a stu­dent, it was the self-reliance that I had devel­oped to pro­tect myself against “beau­ty black­mail” that made me attrac­tive to oth­ers. My male fel­low stu­dents could not believe that I did not give a damn about what they thought about my body. “You know, my dear,” I would say in response to one of them, “all I need to sur­vive is bread, olives, and sar­dines. That you think my neck is too long is your prob­lem, not mine.”

In any case, when it comes to beau­ty and com­pli­ments, noth­ing is too seri­ous or def­i­nite in the med­i­na, where every­thing can be nego­ti­at­ed. But things seemed to be dif­fer­ent in that Amer­i­can depart­ment store. In fact, I have to con­fess that I lost my usu­al self-con­fi­dence in the New York envi­ron­ment. Not that I am always sure of myself, but I don’t walk around the Moroc­can streets or down the uni­ver­si­ty cor­ri­dors won­der­ing what peo­ple are think­ing about me. Of course, when I hear a com­pli­ment, my ego expands like a cheese souf­flé, but on the whole, I don’t expect to hear much from oth­ers. Some morn­ings, I feel ugly because I am sick or tired; oth­ers, I feel won­der­ful because it is sun­ny out or I have writ­ten a good para­graph. But sud­den­ly, in that peace­ful Amer­i­can store that I entered tri­umphant­ly, as a sov­er­eign cos­tumer ready to spend mon­ey, I felt sav­age­ly attacked. My hips, until then the sign of a relaxed and unin­hib­it­ed matu­ri­ty, were sud­den­ly being con­demned as a deformity.

“And who decides the norm?” I asked the salesla­dy, in an attempt to regain some self-con­fi­dence by chal­leng­ing the estab­lished rules. I nev­er let oth­ers eval­u­ate me, if only because I remem­ber my child­hood too well. In ancient Fez, which val­ued round-faced plump ado­les­cents, I was repeat­ed­ly told that I was too tall, too skin­ny, my cheek­bones were too high, my eyes were too slant­ed. My moth­er often com­plained that I would nev­er find a hus­band and urged me to study and learn all that I could, from sto­ry­telling to embroi­dery, in order to sur­vive. But I often retort­ed that since “Allah had cre­at­ed me the way I am, how could he be so wrong, Moth­er?” That would silence the poor woman for a while, because if she con­tra­dict­ed me, she would be attack­ing God him­self. And this tac­tic of glo­ri­fy­ing my strange looks as a divine gift not only helped me to sur­vive in my stuffy city, but also caused me to start believ­ing the sto­ry myself. I became almost self-con­fi­dent. I say almost, because I real­ized ear­ly on that self-con­fi­dence is not a tan­gi­ble and sta­ble thing like a sil­ver bracelet that nev­er changes over the years. Self-con­fi­dence is like a tiny frag­ile light, which goes on and off. You have to replen­ish it constantly.

“And who says that every­one must be a size 6?” I joked to the salesla­dy that day, delib­er­ate­ly neglect­ing to men­tion size 4, which is the size of my 12-year-old niece.

At that point, the salesla­dy sud­den­ly gave me and anx­ious look. “The norm is every­where, my dear,” she said. “It’s all over, in the mag­a­zines, on tele­vi­sion, in the ads. You can’t escape it. There is Calvin Klein, Ralph Lau­ren, Gian­na Ver­sace, Gior­gio Armani, Mario Valenti­no, Sal­va­tore Fer­rag­amo, Chris­t­ian Dior, Yves Saint-Lau­rent, Chris­t­ian Lacroix, and Jean-Paul Gaulti­er. Big depart­ment stores go by the norm.” She paused and then con­clud­ed, “If they sold size 14 or 16, which is prob­a­bly what you need, they would go bankrupt.”

She stopped for a minute and then stared at me, intrigued. “Where on earth do you come from? I am sor­ry I can’t help you. Real­ly, I am.” And she looked it too. She seemed, all of a sud­den, inter­est­ed, and brushed off anoth­er woman who was seek­ing her atten­tion with a cut­ting, “Get some­one else to help you, I’m busy.” Only then did I notice that she was prob­a­bly my age, in her late fifties. But unlike me, she had the thin body of an ado­les­cent girl. Her knee-length, navy-blue, Chanel dress had a white silk col­lar rem­i­nis­cent of the sub­dued ele­gance of aris­to­crat­ic French Catholic school­girls at the turn of the cen­tu­ry. A pearl-stud­ded belt empha­sized the slim­ness of her waist. With her metic­u­lous­ly styled short hair and sophis­ti­cat­ed make­up, she looked half my age at first glance.

“I come from a coun­try where there is no size for wom­en’s clothes,” I told her. “I buy my own mate­r­i­al and the neigh­bor­hood seam­stress or crafts­man makes me the silk or leather skirt I want. They just take my mea­sure­ments each time I see them. Nei­ther the seam­stress nor I know exact­ly what size my new skirt is. No one cares about my size in Moroc­co as long as I pay tax­es on time. Actu­al­ly, I don’t know what my size is, to tell you the truth.”

The sales­woman laughed mer­ri­ly and said that I should adver­tise my coun­try as a par­adise for stressed work­ing women. “You mean you don’t watch your weight?” she inquired, with a tinge of dis­be­lief in her voice. And then, after a brief moment of silence, she added in a low­er reg­is­ter, as if talk­ing to her­self: “Many women work­ing in high­ly paid fash­ion-relat­ed jobs could lose their posi­tions if they did­n’t keep to a strict diet.”

Her words sound­ed so sim­ple, but the threat they implied was so cru­el that I real­ized for the first time that maybe “size 6” is a more vio­lent restric­tion imposed on women than is the Mus­lim veil. Quick­ly I said good­bye so as not to make any more demands on the salesla­dy’s time or involve her in any more unwel­come, con­fi­den­tial exchanges about age-dis­crim­i­na­to­ry salary cuts. A sur­veil­lance cam­era was prob­a­bly watch­ing us both.

Yes, I thought as I wan­dered off, I have final­ly found the answer to my harem enig­ma. Unlike the Mus­lim man, who uses space to estab­lish male dom­i­na­tion by exclud­ing women from the pub­lic are­na, the West­ern man manip­u­lates time and light. He declares that in order to be beau­ti­ful, a woman must look four­teen years old. If she dares to look fifty, or worse, six­ty, she is beyond the pale. By putting the spot­light on the female child and fram­ing her as the ide­al of beau­ty, he con­demns the mature woman to invis­i­bil­i­ty. In fact, the mod­ern West­ern man enforces Immanuel Kan­t’s nine­teenth-cen­tu­ry the­o­ries: To be beau­ti­ful, women have to appear child­ish and brain­less. When a woman looks mature and self-assertive, or allows her hips to expand, she is con­demned as ugly. Thus, the walls of the Euro­pean harem sep­a­rate youth­ful beau­ty from ugly maturity.

These West­ern atti­tudes, I thought, are even more dan­ger­ous and cun­ning than the Mus­lim ones because the weapon used against women is time. Time is less vis­i­ble, more flu­id than space. The West­ern man uses images and spot­lights to freeze female beau­ty with­in an ide­al­ized child­hood, and forces women to per­ceive aging—that nor­mal unfold­ing of years—as a shame­ful deval­u­a­tion. “Here I am, trans­formed into a dinosaur,” I caught myself say­ing aloud as I went up and down the rows of skirt in the store, hop­ing to prove the salesla­dy wrong—to no avail. This West­ern time-defined veil is even cra­zier than the space-defined one enforced by the Ayatollahs.

The vio­lence embod­ied in the West­ern harem is less vis­i­ble than in the East­ern harem because aging is not attacked direct­ly, but rather masked as an aes­thet­ic choice. Yes, I sud­den­ly felt nor only very ugly but also quite use­less in that store, where, if you had big hips, you were sim­ply out of the pic­ture. You drift­ed into the fringes of noth­ing­ness. By putting the spot­light on the pre­pu­bes­cent female, the West­ern man veils the old­er, more mature woman, wrap­ping her in shrouds of ugli­ness. This idea gives me the chills because it tat­toos the invis­i­ble harem direct­ly onto a wom­an’s skin. Chi­nese foot­bind­ing worked the same way: Men declared beau­ti­ful only those women who had small, child­like feet. Chi­nese men did not force women to ban­dage their feet to keep them from devel­op­ing normally—all they did was to define the beau­ty ide­al. In feu­dal Chi­na, a beau­ti­ful woman was the one who vol­un­tar­i­ly sac­ri­ficed her right to unhin­dered phys­i­cal move­ment by muti­lat­ing her own feet, and there­by prov­ing that her main goal in life was to please men. Sim­i­lar­ly, in the West­ern world, I was expect­ed to shrink my hips into a size 6 if I want­ed to find a decent skirt tai­lored for a beau­ti­ful woman. We Mus­lim women have only one month of fast­ing, Ramadan, but the poor West­ern woman who diets has to fast twelve months out of the year. “Quelle hor­reur,” I kept repeat­ing to myself, while look­ing around at the Amer­i­can women shop­ping. Al those my age looked like youth­ful teenagers.

Accord­ing to the writer Nao­mi Wolf, the ide­al size for Amer­i­can mod­els decreased sharply in the 1990s. “A gen­er­a­tion ago, the aver­age mod­el weighed 8 per­cent less than the aver­age Amer­i­can woman, where­as today she weighs 23 per­cent less… The weight of Miss Amer­i­ca plum­met­ed, and the aver­age weight of Play­boy Play­mates dropped from 11 per­cent below the nation­al aver­age in 1970 to 17 per­cent below it in 8 years.” The shrink­ing of the ide­al size, accord­ing to Wolf, is one of the pri­ma­ry rea­sons for anorex­ia and oth­er health-relat­ed prob­lems: “Eat­ing dis­or­ders rose expo­nen­tial­ly, and a mass of neu­ro­sis was pro­mot­ed that used food and weight to strip women of … a sense of control.”

Now, at last, the mys­tery of the West­ern harem made sense. Fram­ing youth as beau­ty and con­demn­ing matu­ri­ty is the weapon used against women in the West just as lim­it­ed access to pub­lic space is the weapon used in the East. The objec­tive remains iden­ti­cal in both cul­tures: to make women feel unwel­come, inad­e­quate, and ugly.

The pow­er of West­ern man resides in dic­tat­ing what women should wear and how they should look. He con­trols the whole fash­ion indus­try, from cos­met­ics to under­wear. The West, I real­ized, was the only part of the world where wom­en’s fash­ion is a man’s busi­ness. In places like Moroc­co, where you design your own clothes and dis­cuss them with crafts­men and –women, fash­ion is your own busi­ness. Not so in the West. As Nao­mi Wolf explains in The Beau­ty Myth, men have engi­neered a prodi­gious amount of fetish-like, fash­ion-relat­ed para­pher­na­lia: “Pow­er­ful industries—the $33-bil­lion-a-year diet indus­try, the $20-bil­lion-a-year cos­met­ic indus­try, and the $7‑billion pornog­ra­phy industry—have arisen from the cap­i­tal made out of uncon­scious anx­i­eties, and are in turn able, through their influ­ence on mass cul­ture, to use, stim­u­late, and rein­force the hal­lu­ci­na­tion in a ris­ing eco­nom­i­cal spiral.”

But how does the sys­tem func­tion? I won­dered. Why do women accept it?

Of all the pos­si­ble expla­na­tions, I like that of the French soci­ol­o­gist, Pierre Bour­dieu, the best. In his lat­est book, La Dom­i­na­tion Mas­cu­line, he pro­pos­es some­thing he calls, la vio­lence sym­bol­ique”: “Sym­bol­ic vio­lence is a form of pow­er which is ham­mered direct­ly on the body, and as if by mag­ic, with­out any appar­ent phys­i­cal con­straint. But this mag­ic oper­ates only because it acti­vates the codes pound­ed in the deep­est lay­ers of body.” Read­ing Bour­dieu, I had the impres­sion that I final­ly under­stood West­ern man’s psy­che bet­ter. The cos­met­ic and fash­ion indus­tries are only the tip of the ice­berg, he states, which is why women are so ready to adhere to their dic­tates. Some­thing else is going on on a far deep­er lev­el. Oth­er­wise, why would women belit­tle them­selves so spon­ta­neous­ly? Why, argues Bor­dieu, would women make their lives more dif­fi­cult, for exam­ple, by pre­fer­ring men who are taller or old­er than they are? “The major­i­ty of French women wish to have a hus­band who is old­er and also, which seems con­sis­tent, big­ger as far as size is con­cerned,” writes Bor­dieu. Caught in the enchant­ed sub­mis­sion char­ac­ter­is­tic of the sym­bol­ic vio­lence inscribed in the mys­te­ri­ous lay­ers of the flesh, women relin­quish what he calls “les signes ordi­nar­ies de la hiérar­chie sex­uelle,” the ordi­nary signs of sex­u­al hier­ar­chy, such as old age and a larg­er body. By so doing, explains Bor­dieu, women spon­ta­neous­ly accept the sub­servient posi­tion. It is this spon­tane­ity Bour­dieu describes as mag­ic enchantment.

Once I under­stood how this mag­ic sub­mis­sion worked, I became very hap­py the con­ser­v­a­tive Aya­tol­lahs do not know about it yet. If they did, they would read­i­ly switch to its sophis­ti­cat­ed meth­ods, because they are so much more effec­tive. To deprive me of food is def­i­nite­ly to deprive me of my think­ing capabilities.

Both Nao­mi Wolf and Pierre Bor­dieu come the con­clu­sion that insid­i­ous “body codes” par­a­lyze West­ern wom­en’s abil­i­ties to com­pete for pow­er, even though access to edu­ca­tion and pro­fes­sion­al oppor­tu­ni­ties seem wide open, because the rules of the game are so dif­fer­ent accord­ing to gen­der. Women enter pow­er games with so much of their ener­gy deflect­ed to their phys­i­cal appear­ance that one hes­i­tates to say that the play­ing field is lev­el. “A cul­tur­al fix­a­tion on female thin­ness is not an obses­sion about female beau­ty,” explains Wolf. It is “an obses­sion about female obe­di­ence. Diet­ing is the most potent polit­i­cal seda­tive in wom­en’s his­to­ry; a qui­et­ly mad pop­u­la­tion is a tractable one.” Research, she con­tends, “con­firmed what most women know too well—that con­cern with weight leads to a ‘vir­tu­al col­lapse of self-esteem and sense of effec­tive­ness’ and that … ‘pro­longed and peri­od­ic caloric restric­tion’ result­ed in a dis­tinc­tive per­son­al­i­ty whose traits are pas­siv­i­ty, anx­i­ety, and emo­tion­al­i­ty.” Sim­i­lar­ly, Bour­dieu, who focus­es more on how this myth ham­mers its inscrip­tions onto the flesh itself, rec­og­nizes that con­stant­ly remind­ing women of their phys­i­cal appear­ances desta­bi­lizes them emo­tion­al­ly because it reduces them to exhib­it­ed objects. “By con­fin­ing women to the sta­tus of sym­bol­i­cal objects to be seen and per­ceives by the oth­er, mas­cu­line dom­i­na­tion … puts women in a state of con­stant phys­i­cal inse­cu­ri­ty… They have to strive cease­less­ly to be engag­ing, attrac­tive, and avail­able.” Being frozen into the pas­sive posi­tion of an object whose very exis­tence depends on the eyes of its behold­er turns the edu­cat­ed mod­ern West­ern women into a harem slave.

“I thank you, Allah, for spar­ing me the tyran­ny of the ‘size 6 harem.’ ” I repeat­ed­ly said to myself while seat­ed on the Paris-Casablan­ca flight, on my way back home at last. “I am so hap­py that the con­ser­v­a­tive male elite does not know about it. Imag­ine the fun­da­men­tal­ists switch­ing from the veil to forc­ing women to fit size 6.”

How can you stage a cred­i­ble polit­i­cal demon­stra­tion and shout in the streets that your human rights have been vio­lat­ed when you can­not find the right skirt?

Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top