Huh?

I absolute­ly can­not think of a log­i­cal expla­na­tion for this, oth­er than what one offi­cer said—it’s a whol­ly par­ti­san thing. 

The Pen­ta­gon does­n’t want you to vote overseas
A Web site main­tained by the Depart­ment of Defense is block­ing access to non-mil­i­tary Amer­i­cans. Could it be wor­ried that expa­tri­ates are lean­ing toward Kerry?

Sept. 21, 2004  |  On Mon­day, the Inter­na­tion­al Her­ald Tri­bune report­ed that the Pen­ta­gon is restrict­ing inter­na­tion­al access to the Web site for the Fed­er­al Vot­ing Assis­tance Pro­gram, the offi­cial gov­ern­ment agency that helps Amer­i­cans liv­ing abroad reg­is­ter to vote in the Novem­ber election.

Accord­ing to the IHT, Amer­i­cans who con­nect to the Inter­net using one of sev­er­al for­eign Inter­net ser­vice providers have report­ed dif­fi­cul­ty log­ging in to the vot­ing-assis­tance site. The Pen­ta­gon con­firmed that it is block­ing traf­fic from these ISPs—which pro­vide Inter­net ser­vice in 25 countries—but it declined to say why.

News of the Pen­tagon’s traf­fic-block­ing imme­di­ate­ly aroused alarm and sus­pi­cion among vot­ing-rights activists, and it’s not hard to see why. For the 6 mil­lion Amer­i­cans liv­ing abroad, sign­ing up to vote at home is a daunt­ing task, a Byzan­tine process that dif­fers for each cit­i­zen depend­ing on his or her home state and even home county.

Over the past year, the Fed­er­al Vot­ing Assis­tance Pro­gram Web site has been wide­ly adver­tised all over the for­eign press as the way for Amer­i­cans to get help on how to vote in the upcom­ing elec­tion. The site, which is main­tained by the Depart­ment of Defense, is a non­par­ti­san, com­pre­hen­sive, and offi­cial clear­ing­house for vot­ing reg­is­tra­tion infor­ma­tion. Now that it’s been put off-lim­its to many Amer­i­cans just before reg­is­tra­tion dead­lines kick in, activists fear that Amer­i­cans will be unfair­ly barred from vot­ing this year.

Why would the Pen­ta­gon do this? Offi­cials at the Vot­ing Assis­tance Pro­gram have told some Amer­i­cans liv­ing abroad that the blocked ISPs were havens for “hack” attacks against the vot­ing site; the Pen­ta­gon had no choice but to block them in order to keep the vot­ing site secure from attack. But that expla­na­tion is extreme­ly fishy, say crit­ics who see some­thing more nefar­i­ous at work. The Defense Depart­ment main­tains all man­ner of sen­si­tive Web sites — for instance, MyPay, which allows mil­i­tary per­son­nel to man­age their com­pen­sa­tion online — and it’s had no prob­lem pro­tect­ing those from hack­ers while keep­ing them open for legit­i­mate uses.

“This is a com­plete­ly par­ti­san thing,” one Defense Depart­ment vot­ing offi­cial told Salon. The offi­cial, who asked to remain anony­mous for fear of being fired, is one of the many peo­ple in the depart­ment assigned to help both uni­formed mil­i­tary per­son­nel as well as Amer­i­can civil­ians reg­is­ter to vote. The offi­cial described the Pen­ta­gon as extreme­ly dili­gent in its efforts to reg­is­ter sol­diers sta­tioned overseas—for instance, vot­ing assis­tance offi­cers have been told by the depart­ment to per­son­al­ly meet with all of the sol­diers in their units in order to help them reg­is­ter. But the depart­ment has ignored its man­date to help over­seas civil­ians who want to vote, the offi­cial said.

Not sur­pris­ing­ly, polit­i­cal poll­sters believe that uni­formed mil­i­tary per­son­nel, espe­cial­ly mil­i­tary offi­cers, lean toward Repub­li­cans in their vot­ing habits; Amer­i­can civil­ians who live abroad, mean­while, are par­tic­u­lar­ly pro­gres­sive. One recent Zog­by sur­vey, for exam­ple, showed that vot­ers with pass­ports sup­port­ed Ker­ry over Bush by a mar­gin of 55 to 33 percent.

The official—a self-described Demo­c­rat who adheres to require­ments of non-par­ti­san­ship as a vot­ing officer—could see no expla­na­tion oth­er than pure polit­i­cal trick­ery in the Pen­tagon’s deci­sion to block the FVAP Web site. “There is no way in hell that this is not a delib­er­ate par­ti­san attempt to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly dis­en­fran­chise a large Demo­c­ra­t­ic vot­ing bloc,” the offi­cial said.

It’s easy to see why the Bush admin­is­tra­tion might be wor­ried about the prospect of huge num­bers of Amer­i­can civil­ians liv­ing abroad exer­cis­ing their right to vote. In efforts to reg­is­ter Amer­i­cans liv­ing over­seas, the offi­cial has come across a host of peo­ple who say they’re sign­ing up specif­i­cal­ly to has­ten Bush’s defeat. “I’ve had so many old peo­ple com­ing to reg­is­ter say, ‘I haven’t vot­ed in such a long time,’ or ‘The last time I vot­ed in an elec­tion was when Kennedy ran, but we’ve got to get rid of this man. This man makes me ashamed to be an American.’ ”

In order to help Amer­i­cans liv­ing over­seas to get around the Pen­tagon’s block of the FVAP site, the Vot­er Ver­i­fied Foun­da­tion has launched a proxy site here. Will Doher­ty, the exec­u­tive direc­tor of Ver­i­fied Vot­ing, said he hoped that the proxy would pres­sure the Pen­ta­gon into drop­ping its access ban. 

Cur­rent Mood: 🙁wor­ried
Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top