Aisle Be Damned

By Gene Weingarten

I think we can all agree with our pres­i­dent that gay mar­riage is a grave threat to Amer­i­ca, because if it weren’t, our pres­i­dent would not have this issue to flog and might lose the elec­tion, and then who would pro­tect us from being mur­dered by poor­ly shaven indi­vid­u­als from Mid­dle East­ern nations?

No, wait. That can’t be right. The rea­son gay mar­riage is a grave threat to Amer­i­ca must be that if we let gay peo­ple mar­ry, the entire hal­lowed insti­tu­tion of mar­riage will be dis­graced. No one will take mar­riage seri­ous­ly any­more. Pret­ty soon the Amer­i­can divorce rate will start approach­ing 50 per­cent, and the sanc­ti­ty of the whole process will be com­pro­mised, with pop stars get­ting drunk, mar­ried, and annulled all on the same week­end. And then, before you know it, peo­ple will take mar­riage so casu­al­ly that romance and pas­sion them­selves will erode, cou­ples will no longer care about how they look to each oth­er, and Amer­i­ca will become a nation of peo­ple wad­dling around with keis­ters the size, tex­ture, and pli­a­bil­i­ty of weath­er balloons.

Oh, wait.

Well, that’s not why, any­way. The argu­ment against legal­iz­ing gay mar­riage must be the same as the argu­ment against legal­iz­ing drugs: If you legal­ize gay mar­riage, every­one will want to do it. Clear­ly, we all have these mas­sive, pent-up, homo­sex­u­al urges wait­ing to erupt, once we get the gid­dyap go-ahead from the gov­ern­ment. George Bush and Dick Cheney might take up res­i­dence togeth­er in a sim­ply dar­ling Crys­tal City duplex. If gays are allowed to get mar­ried, guys like me will start look­ing at our wives and think­ing, wait a minute, I have to set­tle for this weak lit­tle, squeaky-voiced, thong-wear­ing thing when Sylvester Stal­lone is available?

Oh, wait.

Actu­al­ly, I guess the real rea­son to oppose gay mar­riage is that God is opposed to it, as cer­ti­fied by Leviti­cus (Lev. 20:13). Because this is an actu­al book of the Bible, we must obey every­thing it says lit­er­al­ly, which is why Bill Cos­by, Newt Gin­grich, Albert Ein­stein, and Bill Clin­ton have all been duly put to death for adul­tery, the pre­scribed pun­ish­ment (Lev. 20:10). Or why any­one who shaves his head (Lev. 21:5) or wears cloth­ing made from both wool and linen togeth­er (Lev. 19:19) or mar­ries a divorced woman (Lev. 21:7) has been pub­licly con­demned as a sin­ner. Or why any mar­ried cou­ple that has sex when the woman is men­stru­at­ing has been ban­ished from civ­i­lized soci­ety and left
to wan­der the earth (Lev. 20:18).

Well, maybe not.

But per­haps the best argu­ment for why gay mar­riage is a grave threat to Amer­i­ca is his­tor­i­cal. His­tor­i­cal­ly, when a soci­ety begins to con­done deca­dence and licen­tious­ness, it col­laps­es like a souf­fle in an earth­quake. The nations that sur­vive and pros­per and become world pow­ers are the ones that adhere to strict moral codes, like Yemen, Dji­bouti, Myan­mar, and that one with all the goats.

Okay, I con­fess that I don’t real­ly under­stand why any­one gives a fig about this issue, but I am sure our pres­i­dent knows best, by virtue of his supe­ri­or brain and his Doc­tor of Thinkol­o­gy degree. If he says that it requires a con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment to rec­ti­fy this griev­ous error, then, by gum, I am all for it. I have been look­ing at the Con­sti­tu­tion, actu­al­ly, and I have to admit that an anti-gay-mar­riage amend­ment would fit right in.

You’d hard­ly know it was there. You could even add it to an exist­ing amendment.

For exam­ple, Amend­ment VIII: “Exces­sive bail shall not be required, nor exces­sive fines imposed, nor cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ments inflict­ed. Also, ix-nay on the omos-hay, okay?”

But if we do fol­low this path, we real­ly ought to con­sid­er anoth­er con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment, draw­ing not only from this same intense desire to improve our soci­ety but from our increas­ing will­ing­ness to invoke the deity to do so:

Pro­posed Amend­ment XXVIII:

“It shall be unlaw­ful to use the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion as a play­thing for the polit­i­cal­ly self-right­eous. Vio­la­tors should all go to Hell.”

Gene Wein­garten’s e‑mail address is weingarten@washpost.com.

From http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top