Responses to the Ex-Wife

I’ve removed the two posts I made on 9/26 that quot­ed excerpts from mate­r­i­al that Sam’s ex-wife left on an old hard dri­ve of hers. She con­tact­ed LJ abuse and stat­ed that she owned the copy­right to those mate­ri­als, acknowl­edg­ing that they were indeed her words. That’s a legit­i­mate rea­son not to use the actu­al excerpts with­out permission.

I delet­ed the sec­ond of those posts, though I did not hear any­thing from LJ abuse about that one, for the ben­e­fit of anoth­er LJ user who is an asso­ciate of Sam’s ex-wife.

How­ev­er, my rea­son for post­ing them still stands—not to harass her but to defend myself and Sam against her accu­sa­tions that I’ve abused R and G, and that the chil­dren were in an unhealthy home envi­ron­ment here.

Yes, this is anoth­er pub­lic post. Unlike the ex-wife, I don’t play the pas­sive-aggres­sive game of call­ing some­thing “an open let­ter to X” while pre­vent­ing that per­son from read­ing it easily.

Abuse Accusations
I have nev­er abused any per­son in any sense of the word. Peri­od. Not once. If I were to do so to any­one, I’d want some­one to report it imme­di­ate­ly, because I’d obvi­ous­ly be com­plete­ly off my rock­er and in need of seri­ous pro­fes­sion­al help. Any­one with evi­dence that I’ve ever done so is invit­ed to step right up and present it to the author­i­ties. In fact, I ask that you do so.

Of course, one has to ques­tion the cred­i­bil­i­ty of abuse accu­sa­tions from a per­son who beat her five-year-old until she raised welts, and stat­ed that she MEANT to beat her that hard because she was angry. When there are many wit­ness­es to the years of ver­bal, phys­i­cal, and emo­tion­al abuse and neglect that per­son inflict­ed on both of her chil­dren and her then-hus­band, and she’s left volu­mi­nous records of her own words that acknowl­edge all of the above as well as repeat­ed­ly expos­ing both chil­dren to some­one she claims was a pedophile, it looks more and more like she’s look­ing to blame some­one else for the results of her own actions.

Home Envi­ron­ments
Abusers typ­i­cal­ly seek to iso­late their vic­tims from sup­port net­works. In con­trast, we’ve worked to extend the chil­dren’s con­tact with friends and fam­i­ly mem­bers. We gave them more social oppor­tu­ni­ties than they’d ever had in their lives pre-1998. We pro­vid­ed a home that was safe, clean, and wel­com­ing, and enter­tained friends of all ages almost every week. The chil­dren were encour­aged to invite friends they met at school and oth­er places into our home. We facil­i­tat­ed them going to friends’ hous­es, Scout meet­ings, con­gre­ga­tion­al youth group events, etc. Sam has run uncount­able games for them. I became a Girl Scout leader so our girls would have good troops. Our home became a pop­u­lar gath­er­ing place for the kids’ friends.

We lived in our house in Stone Moun­tain for three years, then moved to our cur­rent 4‑bedroom apart­ment, mak­ing sure that we have room for all the kids.

We’ve mod­eled healthy rela­tion­ships and bound­ary set­tings with friends and fam­i­lies of ori­gin. Some of the most incred­i­ble com­pli­ments we’ve ever received were from peo­ple who specif­i­cal­ly sought out our com­pa­ny (and con­tin­ue to do so) because they admired our fam­i­ly and the way we par­ent­ed. All three kids have been encour­aged to build healthy friend­ships with adults out­side our house­hold so that they’d have oth­ers to whom they could turn if they had any con­cerns. R described one of those adults to his moth­er as “like anoth­er Mom to G.”

We haven’t been “good time” par­ents. We haven’t put being friends with the kids over being good par­ents, because we love all three kids too much to cheat them of true, ded­i­cat­ed par­ent­ing, even when it isn’t fun.

In con­trast, Sam’s ex-wife moved thou­sands of miles away from friends and fam­i­ly mem­bers after quit­ting her job and receiv­ing notice that she was being evict­ed from her apart­ment. She moved from job to job and had no sta­ble res­i­dence for at least a year after the move. On the kids’ first vis­it with her there over spring break in 2000, she was liv­ing on a house­boat with no func­tion­al plumb­ing. The kids had to get off the boat and go down the pier to pub­lic restrooms. They told us that one room was giv­en over to use for the cat’s waste prod­ucts, with the ex-wife’s cat shit­ting and piss­ing with­out any actu­al lit­ter­box mate­r­i­al or attempt to clean it up.

R has been sleep­ing in the liv­ing room for months, as the ex-wife has­n’t moved to a house with a bed­room for him. He has no space of his own or any pri­va­cy, accord­ing to his con­ver­sa­tions with Sam. Accord­ing to the chil­dren, their moth­er for­mer­ly had her own bed­room, which G sleeps in now (or shares with her mother—her sto­ries vary). In any case, there are two adults and two chil­dren liv­ing in a two-bed­room, one-bath apart­ment with no plans to move to a larg­er place.

The kids haven’t men­tioned hav­ing any friends vis­it­ing their home. In fact, G can’t name one friend in that state. R has men­tioned a girl­friend and was appar­ent­ly alone with that girl in her bed­room recent­ly, a report which caused con­cern to us as it reflect­ed an appar­ent lack of any adult super­vi­sion (or com­pe­tent super­vi­sion, in any case). He has repeat­ed­ly men­tioned expe­ri­enc­ing harass­ment and bul­ly­ing at his new school, though. G says that she isn’t being allowed to par­tic­i­pate in Girl Scouts, although she has told us that she wants to do so.
00
And obvi­ous­ly, the chil­dren have no fam­i­ly near­by oth­er than their mother.

G’s only social activ­i­ties (accord­ing to G) have involved her moth­er’s hob­bies of costuming/period dance gath­er­ings. She has­n’t got­ten to know any­one sig­nif­i­cant­ly or seen any of those peo­ple out­side the group activities.

Not much of a sup­port net­work at all, is it? In fact, it sounds much more like the iso­lat­ing pat­terns of a typ­i­cal abuser than a lov­ing parent.

Per­haps the ex-wife does­n’t con­sid­er lack of con­tact with fam­i­ly so egre­gious, as she has described events like her and the chil­dren being held hostage by her alleged­ly alco­holic, armed father in 1998. (She cer­tain­ly did­n’t tell Sam about that inci­dent, though it hap­pened after he’d tak­en pri­ma­ry phys­i­cal cus­tody of the children.)

Health Issues
Abusers sel­dom seek ther­a­py, espe­cial­ly indi­vid­u­al­ly and as a fam­i­ly, for issues, because they don’t want to take the chance of hav­ing the abuse come to light. Sam and I first start­ed coun­sel­ing as a cou­ple in 1999. We began fam­i­ly ther­a­py in 2000 and con­tin­ued through this year. Every mem­ber of the fam­i­ly has also had indi­vid­ual ther­a­py, and all the ther­a­pists have com­mu­ni­cat­ed with each other.

In fact, it was our fam­i­ly ther­a­pist who ini­tial­ly sug­gest­ed that we con­sid­er ADHD/ADD as a pos­si­ble expla­na­tion for the issues R and G were hav­ing at home and at school. We were extreme­ly resis­tant to that diag­no­sis and took a lot of con­vinc­ing before we’d con­sid­er it at all. We did a lot of research. Since Sam fit the cri­te­ria, too, he began treat­ment first, because he was­n’t going to sub­ject R or G to any­thing he had­n’t tried if he had the same con­di­tion. Because Adder­all was a major help to him, he chose to allow the chil­dren to try it. It did make a seri­ous pos­i­tive dif­fer­ence in their lives, and both chil­dren stat­ed clear­ly to us and their ther­a­pists and physi­cian that they WANTED to con­tin­ue tak­ing their medications.

The kids have been coached by their moth­er on what to say to their new doc­tors and ther­a­pists. Their moth­er is whol­ly against the entire men­tal health pro­fes­sion and has been adamant that her chil­dren did­n’t need any kind of ther­a­py or med­ica­tion from the begin­ning of their treat­ment. She has them say­ing things to con­vince their doc­tors of the same—quite a change from what they said inde­pen­dent­ly to ther­a­pists, physi­cians, and their guardian ad litem here.

So now R is off his med­ica­tion. For­tu­nate­ly, there’s a court order requir­ing that the new doc­tors coor­di­nate G’s care with her doc­tor here for six months, so she’s still being treat­ed for bipo­lar dis­or­der. We will be sur­prised if that con­tin­ues after the six months is up, though.

G has described what sounds like ama­teur hyp­no­sis and neu­ro-lin­guis­tic pro­gram­ming treat­ments from her moth­er. That’s very trou­ble­some, as her moth­er cer­tain­ly isn’t (to the best of our knowl­edge) cer­ti­fied as a hyp­nother­a­pist or NLP practitioner.

Finan­cial Stability
Until May, Sam worked for three years in a good, if bor­ing, job. He was in his pre­vi­ous job for about the same length of time, and only left it when he had the new job. Since then, he’s worked in one job until the com­pa­ny could­n’t afford him, and has spent many hours seek­ing employ­ment and acquir­ing new skills to improve his chances of find­ing a good job.

We aren’t in any kind of cri­sis despite Sam’s job search, because 1) we imme­di­ate­ly began tak­ing steps to reduce our expens­es, as any respon­si­ble peo­ple would; and 2) Sam and I have always been pret­ty equal in terms of what we con­tribute to our house­hold finan­cial­ly. My income has been sta­ble at pret­ty much its cur­rent lev­el since 1999. I’ve been home with the kids so that they weren’t in day­care or hav­ing to be “latchkey kids.”

The ex-wife has­n’t worked in over 18 months, accord­ing to her state­ments to the court dur­ing the cus­tody case. She’s appar­ent­ly been liv­ing off her house­mate instead, espe­cial­ly since her unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits ran out. Accord­ing to her own posts, she has­n’t sought work, because she did­n’t want more than a very brief com­mute and had oth­er strin­gent require­ments for a job that weren’t eas­i­ly met (espe­cial­ly in the cur­rent mar­ket). She is mod­el­ing a very unhealthy sit­u­a­tion for the kids, not work­ing or doing any­thing else to pro­vide for their house­hold. In court doc­u­ments, she stat­ed that her house­mate gave her a month­ly allowance—that does­n’t sound as if they have whol­ly com­bined their assets, as one would expect of full partners.

Of course, her house­mate has no legal lia­bil­i­ty to care for her and the kids, so we have to con­sid­er that a fair­ly pre­car­i­ous sit­u­a­tion. He seems an hon­or­able man, which is a com­fort. Of course, I don’t have any legal lia­bil­i­ty to pro­vide for Sam or his kids, either, but we’ve been togeth­er for five years and have no inten­tion of chang­ing that. We have ful­ly com­bined our assets, and what’s mine is his.

Despite the fact that she has­n’t worked in so long, the ex-wife has told the chil­dren (as report­ed by them), though, that any­thing they lack is because of a lack of finan­cial sup­port from Sam. Some­how, that just does­n’t make sense, does it? She’s claimed that “you brag about spend­ing mon­ey and then say you can’t afford to vis­it” the kids in Cal­i­for­nia. There’s nev­er been any expec­ta­tion that he would vis­it the chil­dren in Cal­i­for­nia. We live here, in what has been the chil­dren’s home for most of their lives. If their moth­er promised them vis­its there from Sam, she was speak­ing way out of turn. We would­n’t have any­where to stay there, in any case—when vis­it­ing here, the ex-wife gen­er­al­ly stays with friends or fam­i­ly members.

Cur­rent Mood: 😡annoyed
Cur­rent Music: Urban Tapes­try “Wait­ing For Frodo”
Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top