UUPoly Mention

AP arti­cle:
Prac­ti­tion­ers of ‘polyamory’ look for sup­port at Uni­tar­i­an convention

I’m not sure why they put polyamory into quotes. It’s a per­fect­ly rea­son­able word. It’s unfa­mil­iar­i­ty to some peo­ple does­n’t inval­i­date it. If that were the case, most sci­en­tif­ic and many med­ical terms would have to go into quotes.

As if I need­ed any fur­ther rea­son to dis­like the FRC, they had to get their lit­tle swipe in:
“I think polyamory is a fan­cy way of say­ing ‘sleep­ing around.’ For this denom­i­na­tion to even dis­cuss it is an attack on the fam­i­ly. And this type of lifestyle would cer­tain­ly put chil­dren in jeop­ardy,” said Kristin Hansen, a spokes­woman for the con­ser­v­a­tive Fam­i­ly Research Coun­cil in Washington.

Of course, there’s not any expla­na­tion of how the fact that some of us love more than one per­son is an attack on “the fam­i­ly” as an insti­tu­tion. Or how we’re putting kids in jeopardy—ohmigod, they might have more lov­ing adults in their lives! There isn’t any­thing on the FRC’s web­site about it, either. I’m tempt­ed to write to them, but I’m sure I would­n’t get a straight answer anyway.

Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top