Spell-Checker

lit­tle­fire­fae’s teacher needs to read this…

Step Away From the Spell-Checker
Asso­ci­at­ed Press
Sto­ry loca­tion: http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,58058,00.html

08:24 AM Mar. 14, 2003 PT

PITTSBURGH — How might you drag a good writer’s work down to the lev­el of a less­er scribe? Try the spell-check button. 

A study at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pitts­burgh indi­cates spell-check soft­ware may lev­el the play­ing field between peo­ple with dif­fer­ing lev­els of lan­guage skills, ham­per­ing the work of writ­ers and edi­tors who place too much trust in the soft­ware. In the study, 33 under­grad­u­ate stu­dents were asked to proof­read a one-page busi­ness letter—half of them using Microsoft Word with its squig­gly red and green lines under­lin­ing poten­tial errors. 

The oth­er half did it the old-fash­ioned way, using only their heads. 

With­out gram­mar or spelling soft­ware, stu­dents with high­er SAT ver­bal scores made, on aver­age, five errors, com­pared with 12.3 errors for stu­dents with low­er scores. 

Using the soft­ware, stu­dents with high­er ver­bal scores read­ing the same page made, on aver­age, 16 errors, com­pared with 17 errors for stu­dents with low­er scores. 

Den­nis Gal­let­ta, a pro­fes­sor of infor­ma­tion sys­tems at the Katz Busi­ness School, said spell-check­ing soft­ware is so sophis­ti­cat­ed that some have come to trust it too thoroughly. 

“It’s not a soft­ware prob­lem, it’s a behav­ior prob­lem,” he said. 

Microsoft tech­ni­cal spe­cial­ist Tim Pash said gram­mar and spelling tech­nol­o­gy is meant to help writ­ers and edi­tors, not solve all their problems. 

The study found the soft­ware helped stu­dents find and cor­rect errors in the let­ter, but in some cas­es they also changed phras­es or sen­tences flagged by the soft­ware as gram­mat­i­cal­ly sus­pi­cious, even though they were correct. 

For instance, the let­ter includ­ed a pas­sage that said, “Michael Bales would be the best can­di­date. Bales has proven him­self in sim­i­lar rolls.” 

The soft­ware — pick­ing up on the last “s” in “Bales” — sug­gest­ed chang­ing the verb from “has” to “have,” as if it were a plur­al. Mean­while, the spell-check­er ignored “rolls,” which should have been “roles.”

Richard Stern, a com­put­er and elec­tri­cal engi­neer at Carnegie Mel­lon Uni­ver­si­ty spe­cial­iz­ing in speech-recog­ni­tion tech­nol­o­gy, said gram­mar and spelling soft­ware will nev­er approach the com­plex­i­ty of the human mind. 

“Com­put­ers can decide the like­li­hood of cor­rect speech, but it’s a per­cent­age game,” he said.

Cur­rent Music: “Gulf War Song” by Moxy Fruvous
Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top