ADHD Notes

I ran across some very inter­est­ing notes from a lec­ture on ADHD while search­ing for some­thing quite dif­fer­ent. I’m large­ly putting them here for my own ref­er­ence lat­er, but since there was some very sen­si­ble stuff here I decid­ed that per­haps oth­ers would find the infor­ma­tion use­ful, as well.

Dr. Barkley’s ADHD Sem­i­nar Notes

Dr. Rus­sell Barkley, wide­ly con­sid­ered to be the lead­ing research psy­chol­o­gist work­ing on ADHD, is Direc­tor of Psy­chol­o­gy and Pro­fes­sor of Psy­chi­a­try and Neu­rol­o­gy at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Mass­a­chu­setts Med­ical Cen­ter. He has authored sev­er­al books on atten­tion deficit dis­or­der, includ­ing the clas­sic ‘Atten­tion Deficit Hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty Dis­or­der: A Hand­book for Diag­no­sis and Treat­ment.’ The fol­low­ing notes are from a sem­i­nar Barkley pre­sent­ed in Cleve­land on 29 April 1994. The sem­i­nar was spon­sored by the Insti­tute for Adult Devel­op­ment and the Insti­tute for Child & Ado­les­cent Well­ness in Beach­wood, Ohio. 

While com­pil­ing these notes, the lib­er­ty was tak­en of replac­ing such terms as ‘nor­mal’ with ‘aver­age’. For while ADD cer­tain­ly impairs the abil­i­ty of peo­ple to func­tion with expect­ed effi­cien­cy at cer­tain tasks in indus­tri­al­ized soci­eties, it is not to be seen mere­ly as a dis­or­der. Let’s not min­i­mize ADD, but let’s not pathol­o­gize it either. Indeed, many psy­chol­o­gists now speak of ADD as an out­lier in the spec­trum of human neu­ro­log­i­cal vari­a­tion, and there­fore lit­tle dif­fer­ent from oth­er genet­i­cal­ly-deter­mined human traits like hair or eye col­or, height, intel­li­gence, etc. As Thom Hart­mann and Ned Hal­low­ell have advo­cat­ed, ADD should be seen as much as a gift, and indeed many peo­ple with ADD have high intel­li­gence, whether inborn or acquired as a com­pen­sat­ing response nec­es­sary to func­tion in a com­plex soci­ety. While much of Barkley’s pre­sen­ta­tion was ori­ent­ed toward ADD chil­dren, the exten­sions to adult ADD are in most cas­es straight­for­ward. Note that one does not nec­es­sar­i­ly have to agree with all of Barkley’s views, (espe­cial­ly with regard to a sin­gle cause under­ly­ing all ADHD) in order to gain use­ful infor­ma­tion from this essay. 

The notes below were not tak­en from any record­ing. Notes may be redis­trib­uted only if the above com­men­tary is included.


Rus­sell Barkley sem­i­nar on ADHD

Call­ing ADHD an atten­tion dis­or­der triv­i­al­izes it; it is not an atten­tion deficit. Barkley is work­ing on a new the­o­ry to explain the psy­chobi­ol­o­gy beneath the spec­trum of symp­toms usu­al­ly con­sid­ered to be part of the ADD syn­drome. All of these symp­toms are observed in ‘nor­mal’ peo­ple at one time or another—they dif­fer in peo­ple with ADHD by rea­son of their pres­ence since child­hood, their per­sis­tence beyond child­hood, and their severity.

ADD has in the past been termed post-encephalitic behav­ioral dis­or­der, brain-injured child dis­or­der, and min­i­mal brain dis­or­der. The hall­mark tri­ad of symp­toms are:

  • inat­ten­tion or incon­sis­tent attention,
  • hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty
  • impul­sive­ness.

Barkley says that ADD has more to do with lost inter­est than with an inabil­i­ty to con­cen­trate. He esti­mates that ADD affects 2 mil­lion chil­dren in the USA, with the con­di­tion per­sist­ing into adult­hood in the chron­ic form in over 50% of these. Boys are affect­ed at three times the rate. ADD cross­es all social bar­ri­ers, and is present in all eth­nic groups and social classes.

Barkley says that it is mis­lead­ing to speak of three pri­ma­ry char­ac­ter­is­tics of ADD. Might a sin­gle under­ly­ing cause account for the wide range of char­ac­ter­is­tic behav­iors? He believes so and points to the per­sis­tence of effort as the cor­ner­stone of ADD. Some think ADD aris­es from a faulty ‘fil­ter­ing’ mech­a­nism, but this is not the case—it has to do with moti­va­tion. As a result, telling chil­dren or adults to try hard­er is futile and should be stopped—rather, the inter­est of the cur­ricu­lum (or job, etc.) should be increased to keep ADD chil­dren inter­est­ed and motivated.

ADD is not an atten­tion dis­or­der, but a dis­or­der of impulse con­trol. ADD chil­dren do things oth­er kids think of, but don’t actu­al­ly do. The urge to act is not being inhib­it­ed. The first response is the imme­di­ate response. Peo­ple with ADD have trou­ble resist­ing the attrac­tive­ness of things oth­er than that imme­di­ate­ly before them. The observed hyper­ac­tiv­i­ty is not inde­pen­dent from, but born of, the impulse con­trol prob­lem. To be ADD is to be hyper-respon­sive, not hyper­ac­tive. Fail­ure to inhib­it is at the core of the problem.

ADD has an ear­ly onset. 95% are iden­ti­fied by age 7; the mean is age 4. By this time, ‘nor­mal’ chil­dren are learn­ing self-con­trol. All young chil­dren are impul­sive, but they even­tu­al­ly learn con­trol. 20–30% out­grow the con­di­tion. >60% (Barkley thinks it to be 75%) car­ry the con­di­tion in some form into adulthood.

ADD chil­dren act bet­ter in a one-to-one set­ting than in groups. They behave bet­ter in the pres­ence of fathers than moth­ers. This is also observed in oth­er chil­dren. Barkley thinks that in the mind of the child, the per­son (par­ent) who talks los­es, the one who acts wins. Moth­ers tend to talk; fathers tend to act. He sug­gests that you not try to rea­son with your chil­dren in every situation—ADD is not a fail­ure of rea­son, nei­ther is it a fail­ure of knowledge.

For the per­son with ADD, nov­el­ty is a reward. They do well with a rich sched­ule of feed­back. Barkley calls them ‘lit­tle Ed Kochs’, for the New York City may­or known for ask­ing ‘How’m I doing?’. Tell them how they are doing—they want imme­di­ate feed­back, for they oper­ate on the lev­el of imme­di­ate vs. delayed consequences/rewards. Edu­ca­tion is delayed grat­i­fi­ca­tion; they want what feels good now. Those with ADD gen­er­al­ly do bet­ter in the morn­ing (even those who are not ‘morn­ing peo­ple’ find it eas­i­er to func­tion more close to nor­mal in the morn­ing). There­fore, give them the hard work in the morn­ing, and give them some­thing fun to do lat­er. Its impor­tant to real­ize that symp­toms are depen­dent on the envi­ron­ment; one is not going to see all the prob­lems under all circumstances.

The scientist/philosopher Jacob Bronows­ki wrote in ‘The Ascent of Man’ that the most cru­cial event in the evo­lu­tion of the human species was the appear­ance of the abil­i­ty to wait—a trait cru­cial for human func­tion. Barkley sees four aspects to this abil­i­ty to wait.

1. A sense of time

The human mind can keep an event in short-term mem­o­ry. The mind can freeze time by hold­ing on to an event which has passed. Barkley’s the­o­ry of the neu­ropsy­chol­o­gy of ADD pre­dicts that peo­ple with ADD will have poor­er short-term mem­o­ry than aver­age indi­vid­u­als. If you can hold some­thing in short-term mem­o­ry you can ana­lyze it. This abil­i­ty is cru­cial for men­tal cal­cu­la­tions, analy­sis, reflec­tion. Humans can use their minds as time machines, as vehi­cles in which to trav­el between the present, past and future. Oth­er ani­mals can­not sus­tain an image in their minds. We call the abil­i­ty to refer back and forth between past and present hind­sight. If how­ev­er, you don’t wait, you don’t reflect, and there­fore can­not ben­e­fit as well from the wis­dom of hindsight.

We are the only species in the fourth dimen­sion: time. This sense devel­ops between 7 and 8 years of age. Con­ver­sa­tion at this age begins to deal with antic­i­pa­tion, fore­thought, plan­ning. Oth­er kinds learn to ignore stim­uli which may dis­tract from the task at hand. In con­trast, the ADD child does­n’t respond until the event cross­es their win­dow. They don’t respond until hit by the train of time. They don’t deal with things until necessary.

2. Objec­tiv­i­ty

Once you learn to wait, you can stop an emo­tion­al response while you exam­ine it. This is emo­tion vs. objec­tiv­i­ty. If you don’t wait, you will con­tin­ue to be emo­tion­al, and will have dif­fi­cul­ty sep­a­rat­ing emo­tion from objec­tiv­i­ty. It’s facts vs. feel­ings. Those with ADD are more emo­tion­al over the entire spec­trum, from hap­py to sad; they feel their emo­tions more intense­ly than aver­age people.

Objec­tiv­i­ty is required to serve goal-direct­ed behav­ior. Per­spi­cac­i­ty is the kin­dling of moti­va­tion. Moti­va­tion is an emo­tion. The nor­mal atti­tude with an unpleas­ant task is that you ‘stick with it’, as there is a reward at the end. In ADD, the reward must be in the task itself, not after it. Most chil­dren can kin­dle moti­va­tion, the ADD child has to find it in what he is doing at the time—he has trou­ble kin­dling moti­va­tion to do an unpleas­ant task.

3. Reflec­tion

Humans can turn lan­guage on them­selves. We call it reflec­tion, and its the bedrock of self-con­trol. Inter­nal­ized lan­guage devel­ops at 3–4 years of age; it is, there­fore, no sur­prise that ADD is typ­i­cal­ly first noticed at this age. Speech becomes a means for self-con­trol. You can talk to your­self in order to con­trol your­self. This pre­dicts dis­or­ga­nized inter­nal speech in those with ADD. This was actu­al­ly seen in research done 10 years ago, but it was ignored because it did­n’t fit into the pre­vail­ing paradigm.

The pre­dic­tion is that those with ADD will seem younger than their chrono­log­i­cal age; they will seem more child-like than their non-ADD peers. That is why ADD chil­dren are so ‘chat­ty’ and why much of their con­ver­sa­tion deals with the present, and not the future.

4. Recon­sti­tu­tion

The abil­i­ty to hold a thought allows you to take it apart and reassem­ble it in new ways, lead­ing to the obser­va­tion of new rela­tion­ships which were not appar­ent before. We can take nature apart and put it back togeth­er as we please. This has sev­er­al consequences.

  1. We can pro­gres­sive­ly redis­trib­ute parts of a thought for use in par­al­lel processing.
  2. We can reassem­ble the parts into new mes­sages and events (cre­ativ­i­ty)
  3. This is the seed of ver­bal fluency
  4. This leads to a unique world view

It is hard­er for ADD chil­dren to explain things. They don’t get to the point: they talk around the point.

Note that ADD chil­dren and adults are not lack­ing the four aspects of the abil­i­ty to wait—they are in there, but we often can’t see their con­se­quences. Put a child on the prop­er med­ica­tion and all four aspects of the abil­i­ty to wait return—it was there all along. Peo­ple with ADD do not lack the abil­i­ty to wait, they have dif­fi­cul­ty draw­ing upon it.

What are the pur­pos­es of the aspects of the abil­i­ty to wait?

  1. They are relat­ed to self-con­trol. Aver­age chil­dren are self- reg­u­lat­ed, yet they are more free than the ADD child, who being more depen­dent on his envi­ron­ment, actu­al­ly oper­ates on the basis of less free will.
  2. They are required for the orga­ni­za­tion of behav­ior across the span of time.
  3. They direct behav­ior toward the future rather than the present.
  4. They are aimed at the max­i­miza­tion of future consequences.
  5. They allow increased pre­dic­tion and con­trol of the envi­ron­ment (rather than just reac­tion to the environment)
  6. They per­mit us to con­form the envi­ron­ment to our goals.

ADD is a dis­or­der of response inhi­bi­tion and exec­u­tive func­tion, of the abil­i­ty to wait. This pre­dicts that those with ADD will be:

  1. defi­cient in self-regulation,
  2. impaired in orga­niz­ing their behav­ior toward the future, and
  3. dimin­ished in social effec­tive­ness and adaptation.

Eval­u­a­tion of sug­gest­ed causes

  • There are some psy­choso­cial the­o­ries (not wide­ly accepted).
  • Under­ac­tiv­i­ty in the fore­brain (the clas­sic Zametkin stud­ies), i.e., reduced cir­cu­la­tion in the pre­frontal lobe and stria­tum, but this may be a con­se­quence rather than a cause of the ADD. The areas affect­ed are thought to be involved in response, atten­tion and sen­si­tiv­i­ty to reward.
  • Food/diet. That sug­ar is some­how involved is part of the folklore.

Co-mor­bidi­ties: Defi­ance, oppo­si­tion­al behav­ior, argu­men­ta­tive. 20–30% have learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties, 30% have delayed motor skill development.

Hered­i­ty is the best expla­na­tion of the facts. 25% of fathers and 17–25% of moth­ers have the con­di­tion. There is a 40% chance that one of the par­ents has ADD. A 35% chance that one oth­er child in the fam­i­ly has it. A 95% chance that a twin will have it. Can have mul­ti­ple caus­es: any­thing affect­ing frontal lobe devel­op­ment, includ­ing smok­ing and drink­ing dur­ing preg­nan­cy, but most over­whelm­ing major­i­ty of cas­es due to inheritance.

The neu­ro­chem­i­cal bal­ances which lead to the syn­drome of symp­toms we call ADD should not be seen only as a pathol­o­gy, but a genet­ic char­ac­ter­is­tic like height, weight, and intel­li­gence, which can have out­liers. Vari­a­tions in height and weight are accept­ed are seen as nat­ur­al until we see some­one who is extreme­ly tall, short, large or thin. Peo­ple with ADD are ‘neu­ro­chem­i­cal out­liers’ who are more eas­i­ly noticed in west­ern indus­tri­al­ized societies.

With ado­les­cents and young adults the absolute lev­el of symp­toms declines rel­a­tive to child­hood, but 70–80% are ful­ly ADD. The brain is not ful­ly formed until the late 20’s or ear­ly 30’s. Barkley sug­gests that while peo­ple with ADD con­tin­ues to improve with age, their lev­el of self- reg­u­la­to­ry behav­iors is 30% below that of their non-ADD peers. As a guide­line he sug­gests that one sub­tract 30% from some­one’s chrono­log­i­cal age to get an esti­mate of their self-reg­u­la­to­ry behav­ioral matu­ri­ty. As a result, Barkley rec­om­mends break­ing down assign­ments into man­age­able chunks.

ADD teens have four times the auto acci­dents when they start dri­ving. He says that using the guide­line above, 16 year olds have the self- reg­u­la­to­ry behav­ioral matu­ri­ty of 12 year olds, which sug­gests one delay their dri­ver train­ing. [ I don’t know whether this applies to suc­cess­ful­ly med­icat­ed 16 year olds as well ]. The above infor­ma­tion is not meant to stig­ma­tize these chil­dren, but to bet­ter help them. 35% nev­er fin­ish high school.

Adults with ADD suf­fer from poor school/work per­for­mance relat­ed to

  • defi­cient sus­tained atten­tion, read­ing, paper­work, etc.
  • eas­i­ly bored by tedious material
  • poor orga­ni­za­tion, plan­ning, anticipation
  • pro­cras­ti­na­tion until dead­lines imminent
  • trou­ble work­ing in con­fined spaces
  • grab­bing opportunity
  • impul­sive deci­sion mak­ing style
  • can­not work well independently
  • don’t lis­ten to directions
  • fre­quent impul­sive job changes
  • often demor­al­ized
  • putting aside things for now

On the pos­i­tive side: 

  • some­times peo­ple wor­ry over nothing
  • peo­ple some­times con­jec­ture a future which nev­er happens

Some­times the gut response is the best response. Peo­ple with ADD are often pas­sion­ate in a world lack­ing in pas­sion. They expe­ri­ence a wider band­width of the spec­trum of emotions—including anger and love. Many peo­ple appre­ci­ate the arts because they bring back emo­tion that’s been lost. Per­haps talk­ing to your­self all the time isn’t good. You can incu­bate fear and neg­a­tive emo­tion from too much self-talk. Some peo­ple are very suc­cess­ful because they take risks.

On diet fads:

  • Megavitamins/orthomolecular stuff (kid’s lives are not ready for this)
  • Sen­so­ry inte­gra­tion ther­a­py (not devel­oped for ADD)
  • Chi­ro­prac­tic (utter nonsense)

Take home les­son: don’t extend any­thing beyond what it was meant for.

On oth­er therapies:

  • Ocular/auditory exer­cis­es (ridicu­lous)
  • EMG biofeedback/relaxation (mus­cu­lar biofeed­back) and neurofeedback
    (costs $3–6 k/yr results are not lasting)
  • Cog­ni­tive ther­a­py (not always best as ADD is not a skill or knowl­edge deficit)

ADD is a prob­lem of doing what you know to do. Time is not giv­en for com­mon sense one has to emerge. What we want for peo­ple with ADD is for them to per­form what they already know. The hope is that they will be able to do it with less prompting/reward nec­es­sary. The self-con­trol is in there, but it’s dif­fi­cult to call upon it. a per­son has to be ready for treat­ment. 1988–90: Church of Sci­en­tol­ogy launch­es its cam­paign against Rital­in, which Barkley calls ‘safer than aspirin.’

Teach com­pen­sat­ing skills—long term ther­a­py is not usu­al­ly necessary.

How to be an effec­tive ADD par­ent or ADD adult:

  • Become an exec­u­tive. Do not abdi­cate respon­si­bil­i­ty. Pro­fes­sion­als can help but you have to make the final call. Stay informed so you can call the shots.
  • Be sci­en­tif­ic. Read wide­ly to dis­cov­er the truth in a world of fad ther­a­pies. Truth has sev­er­al char­ac­ter­is­tics. Truth emerges from avail­able infor­ma­tion. Truth con­verges from many sources. Exper­i­ment. Maybe this and that will work. Don’t get stuck. Don’t think that this med­i­cine has to work this or that way.
  • Be principled—centered. When you act, fol­low the rules—don’t be reac­tive. The ‘7 Habits of High­ly Effec­tive Peo­ple’ work well with ADD: 
    1. Be proactive—take charge and stop whin­ing. Cut the crap. Go ahead and grieve, but get through it and accept things as they are. Grief should lead to accep­tance. You can then go about chang­ing things proactively.
    2. Begin with the end in mind. Think about your funeral—what would you like them to say? This is an excel­lent idea for any sit­u­a­tion. How do you want this to turn out? Keep that in mind and it will help you per­se­vere. If you see the end you will know what to do.
    3. Put first things first. You cant do it all at once. Pri­or­i­tize. Is hav­ing your kid make his bed all that impor­tant? Mak­ing a bed is not a great pre­dic­tor of success—tidiness is not all that impor­tant; spend­ing qual­i­ty time with your fam­i­ly is.
    4. Think win/win. What will they get out of this? Make sure the per­son you inter­act with feels they have won something.
    5. First under­stand, then be under­stood. What is on their mind? Lis­ten, then take your per­spec­tive into account.
    6. Syn­er­gize. More gets done when work­ing together—how can you both get things done together?
    7. Find renew­al. Look for sources of sat­is­fac­tion, note them, and return to them on occa­sion. Your kids don’t need or want you to be a mar­tyr. ADD peo­ple don’t like being around mar­tyrs. So take care of your­self and get refreshed.

Above notes were com­piled and edit­ed by Dan Diaz ([email protected])
Mod­i­fied Jan­u­ary 9, 2003 

Cyn is Rick's wife, Katie's Mom, and Esther & Oliver's Mémé. She's also a professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4259

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top