WTF? Georgia Senate Threatens to Secede!

Geor­gia Sen­ate threat­ens dis­man­tling of USA
They real­ly did, by a vote of 43–1. On April 1, but it was­n’t an April Fool’s joke.

The res­o­lu­tion goes on to endorse the the­o­ry that states have the right to abridge con­sti­tu­tion­al free­doms of reli­gion, press and speech. Accord­ing to the res­o­lu­tion, it is up to the states to decide “how far the licen­tious­ness of speech and of the press may be abridged.”
Final­ly, the res­o­lu­tion states that if Con­gress, the pres­i­dent or fed­er­al courts take any action that exceeds their con­sti­tu­tion­al pow­ers, the Con­sti­tu­tion is ren­dered null and void and the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca is offi­cial­ly dis­band­ed. As an exam­ple, the res­o­lu­tion specif­i­cal­ly states that if the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment enacts “prohibitions of type or quan­ti­ty of arms or ammunition,” the coun­try is disbanded.

You bet­ter believe that I’m writ­ing to our state sen­a­tor right away. Yes, this non­sense was slipped in on day 39 of the 40-day leg­isla­tive ses­sion, but that is absolute­ly no excuse. Our rep­re­sen­ta­tives have no busi­ness vot­ing for any­thing they haven’t thor­ough­ly read, under­stood, and debat­ed. That’s their job!

Yet anoth­er rea­son I don’t want to live in Geor­gia any­more. I seri­ous­ly think this is a back­lash against our elec­tion of a black Demo­c­rat to the pres­i­den­cy. I’m look­ing at blue states now.

Cyn is Rick's wife, Katie's Mom, and Esther & Oliver's Mémé. She's also a professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4259

3 thoughts on “WTF? Georgia Senate Threatens to Secede!

  1. Hel­lo,

    nice post i like your site very well and con­tin­ue to do so.
    I have brokmark your site.

  2. Sor­ry, Cyn, but as you know, I’m the polar oppo­site of you on most issues. Its unlike­ly I’ll ever bet back to this blog again. I just don’t fol­low up on these things and for­get about ’em. But there IS a 10th amend­ment, #1 and sec­ond­ly, its absolute fool­ish­ness to blame all the anger on the fact that we elect­ed a black Pres­i­dent. A real­ly cheap shot to put it blunt­ly. You sup­port a wom­an’s right to choose to kill her own baby as if it was any less of an abuse because we nev­er look into the eyes of the vic­tim to kill a child before or after birth and in sup­port­ing this choice, you sup­port a Pres­i­dent and a Con­gress who attack many oth­er choic­es through var­i­ous back door means of their own. The Stim­u­lus pack­age which was forced through as an emer­gency was done so with the under­stand­ing that our Con­gress not actu­al­ly read the bill and it includ­ed a health­care sys­tem that takes away doc­tors choic­es on treat­ment options and decides by cost just as a ter­ri­ble HMO like Kaiser does, what kind of help a per­son can get. And if we are to accept Biden’s claims about that part of the bill, he says that Amer­i­cans will just have to real­ize that their 80 year old Grand­moth­er is near the end of her life any­way and she should not get the same kind of treat­ments her grand­kids get and the gov­ern­ment decides who lives and dies and the choice is tak­en away from the patients and fam­i­lies. And now with the Health and Human ser­vices peo­ple, they are try­ing to take away a doc­tor’s right to make a con­sci­en­tious choice if he is a Chris­t­ian who does not want to kill babies. Anoth­er choice denied by the new Reich is that a Catholic or Chris­t­ian child grow­ing up in today’s regime, if these things go for­ward, will be denied the rights to enter into cer­tain job fields like med­i­cine by the restric­tions to their reli­gious rights. This is much like what hap­pened in Eng­land for quite some time where Catholics could not enter into cer­tain fields of study or work. Oba­ma pay­ing off the Union boss­es (most of them thugs and crim­i­nals like the Team­sters) by tak­ing away the right of a secret bal­lot as he is try­ing to do is anoth­er exam­ple of him try­ing to take total con­trol and elim­i­nate choice. So, you want your free­dom to kill babies at the expense of los­ing all oth­er lib­er­ties? I don’t and I whole­heart­ed­ly sup­port leav­ing the Union if this is what it comes to.
    Inci­den­tal­ly, a few years back I sup­port­ed Alan Keyes for Pres­i­dent over Bush and he’s a WHOLE LOT BLACKER than that weasel Oba­ma who is noth­ing more than a paid stooge to George Soros and this whole World bank­ing sys­tem. Truth­ful­ly, I find it rather con­de­scend­ing to have all my pas­sion and con­vic­tion dis­missed by infer­ring that I and most of the oth­ers who believe along with me are “racists”. I’m sor­ry to be so blunt when you are typ­i­cal­ly a whole lot more diplo­mat­ic than in this arti­cle, but it was that state­ment alone that ruined your argu­ment for me above all oth­ers and is way beneath you.

  3. Bryan, I have been more than patient and con­sid­er­ate of your beliefs over the years that we’ve known each oth­er. It’s been so long since you actu­al­ly lis­tened to any­thing I’ve said that you have no actu­al idea what I believe, specif­i­cal­ly, on ANY top­ic. You’ve got­ten so deeply immersed in a cultish adher­ence to what some reli­gious leader tells you to believe that you are unwill­ing or unable to have a ratio­nal con­ver­sa­tion. I’ve been con­sid­er­ate and tol­er­ant far past any rea­son­able expectation.

    The prob­lem goes beyond that, though. Even in our email exchanges, no mat­ter what I say, all you can talk about is the same com­plaints about the same prob­lems you’ve had for 20 years or more–unemployment or under-employ­ment, unten­able liv­ing sit­u­a­tions, no com­pan­ion­ship or “rela­tion­ships” that con­sist sole­ly of yet anoth­er pret­ty girl tak­ing advan­tage of you. You haven’t even pre­tend­ed to read or respond to any­thing I’ve said about my life in that time, because every­thing has to be about you.

    Tak­ing this par­tic­u­lar post per­son­al­ly, as indi­cat­ed by com­ments like “I find it rather con­de­scend­ing to have all my pas­sion and con­vic­tion dis­missed…” and bring­ing up abor­tion, which isn’t even MENTIONED in my post or the arti­cle to which it refers, is typ­i­cal of your irra­tional behv­ior and com­mu­ni­ca­tion. You get your news from places like World­Net Dai­ly, which is noto­ri­ous­ly biased and full of utter non­sense. You don’t even have the brains or mem­o­ry to recall that the stim­u­lus pack­age of which you speak (and its inex­cus­able lack of over­sight) is a lega­cy of the Bush administration.

    Bryan, you’re a reli­gio­fas­cist. You don’t have the intel­li­gence or the crit­i­cal think­ing skills to get into this debate you’re try­ing to start, so I refuse to play. I don’t have the ener­gy to engage in even a ghost of a rela­tion­ship with you, because you are a vast, suck­ing drain of need­i­ness. These are things I would have said pri­vate­ly, but you chose the forum. Goodbye.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top