A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

TotD: Bruce Chatwin on Possessions

And do we not all long to throw down our altars and rid our­selves of our pos­ses­sions? Do we not gaze cold­ly at our clut­ter and say, “If these objects express my per­son­al­i­ty, then I hate my per­son­al­i­ty.” For what, on the face of it, enhances life less than a work of art? One tires of it. One can­not eat it. It makes an uncom­fort­able bed­fel­low. One guards it, and feels oblig­ed to enjoy it long after it has ceased to amuse. We sac­ri­fice our free­dom of action to become its priv­i­leged guardian, and we end its impris­oned slave. All civ­i­liza­tions are by their very nature “thing-ori­ent­ed” and the main prob­lem of their sta­bil­i­ty has been to devise new equa­tions between the urge to amass things and the urge to be rid of them.

But things have a way of insin­u­at­ing them­selves into all human lives. Some peo­ple attract more things than oth­ers, but no peo­ple, how­ev­er mobile, is thin­g­less. A chim­panzee uses sticks and stones as tools, but he does not keep pos­ses­sions. Man does. And the things to which he becomes most attached do not serve any use­ful func­tion. Instead they are sym­bols or emo­tion­al anchors. The ques­tion I should like to ask with­out nec­es­sar­i­ly being able to answer it is, “Why are man’s real trea­sures use­less?” For if we under­stood this, we might also under­stand the con­vo­lut­ed rit­u­als of the art mar­ket.,
Bruce Chatwin Anato­my of Rest­less­ness

3 comments to TotD: Bruce Chatwin on Possessions

  • Well, what about mag­pies? They acquire pos­ses­sions, too. 😉 And, not every man’s trea­sures are use­less. Ask a woman who’s love is bak­ing what her favorite pos­ses­sion is? It might be her mix­er? I bet you’d under­stand a stitcher’s trea­sure trove. 😉 My hus­band’s favorite pos­ses­sion? A com­put­er, far from use­less.

    How­ev­er, I do agree with the emo­tion­al anchor. I do not treat pos­ses­sions as emo­tion­al items, hence I do not have lots of clut­ter. My hus­band and daugh­ter, how­ev­er, have tons. The com­put­er that I men­tion above is not use­ful if it is sit­ting up in the attic for 10 years and is only kept there because it is a sym­bol of peri­od of your life that has passed.

  • I pro­duce art. Prim­i­tive? Yes. Of val­ue to any­one but me? Not like­ly. But my art serves a pur­pose. It reminds me of emo­tions felt and places expe­ri­enced and mem­o­ries of my sons as boys and all kinds of oth­er things that I find of val­ue. A Thing? Yes. But far from use­less. And after I am dead and gone, my art will serve to remind those I leave behind, of me, and my mes­sage to them, the lessons I’ve taught them and the love I’ve giv­en them. Use­less art? I think not.

  • And, of course I total­ly mis­read this whole piece as “pos­ses­sions” rather than “art”. 🙂 I think I need to go back to 8th grade and a read­ing com­pre­hen­sion class.