I’ve Been Saying Fibro Fog Is Like Acquired ADD for HOW Many Years?

Distrac­tion: Shed­ding Light on the Cog­ni­tive Under­pin­nings of Fibromyal­gia Mem­o­ry Loss

Frank Leav­itt, Ph.D.
Frank_Leavitt@rush.edu

Poor mem­o­ry in fibromyal­gia is prob­a­bly one of its least rec­og­nized, but most dis­rup­tive forms of symp­tom expres­sion. It pro­found­ly affects the way peo­ple with fibromyal­gia live their lives. It adds stress whether they are in a con­ver­sa­tion, answer­ing a phone, work­ing on a project, mak­ing a bed, check­ing email, or trav­el­ing by car. Poor mem­o­ry is often cen­tral to why the lives of peo­ple with FMS go out of control.

Neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal test­ing is fre­quent­ly ordered to pro­vide an accu­rate eval­u­a­tion of the cog­ni­tive com­plaint; how­ev­er, test results often land peo­ple painful­ly trou­bled by mem­o­ry dis­rup­tions in a para­dox­i­cal quag­mire. Too often, cog­ni­tive test­ing fails to affirm cog­ni­tive decline. Nor­mal­i­ty of cog­ni­tive find­ings is com­mon place and often mar­shaled to brush aside patient symp­toms, because it is tak­en to mean that their per­cep­tions are in error. The log­ic is flawed because it does not account ful­ly for the many ways mem­o­ry fail­ures arise and over­looks short­com­ings in the test­ing process. The alleged nor­mal­i­ty on exam­i­na­tion may be an arti­fact of neglect­ed cov­er­age because peo­ple with fibromyal­gia bring to the exam­i­na­tion process a par­tic­u­lar type of deficit that is not tak­en into account by the neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal testing.

A clue to unrav­el­ing the dis­crep­an­cy between patient con­vic­tion and neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal find­ings may be to con­sid­er the flaw as resid­ing out­side the bound­aries of patients’ com­plaints. Instead, the flaw may be an arti­fact of the meth­ods used. Per­haps, the stan­dard­ized mea­sures admin­is­tered tap the wrong process­es, there­by hold­ing patients to the wrong stan­dards. An inap­pro­pri­ate­ly con­sti­tut­ed test bat­tery can pro­duce results that mis­rep­re­sent an indi­vid­u­al’s actu­al func­tion­al ability.

Work on-going in patients with fibromyal­gia has iden­ti­fied a very uneven mem­o­ry pro­file in cas­es pre­sent­ing with mem­o­ry loss. They pos­sess many areas of cog­ni­tive strength, and select­ed areas of cog­ni­tive weak­ness. Patients with fibromyal­gia behave essen­tial­ly nor­mal­ly on the high­ly struc­tured neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal tests of mem­o­ry that elim­i­nate dis­trac­tions. By con­trast, adding a source of dis­trac­tion seri­ous­ly reduces their abil­i­ty to remem­ber. The dif­fer­ences in impaired rate between the two types of mea­sures are sub­stan­tial, and reflect the impor­tance of a source of dis­trac­tion in assess­ing mem­o­ry prob­lems in fibromyalgia.

Most tests at the dis­pos­al of neu­ropsy­chol­o­gists oper­ate as atten­tion-direct­ed tasks free of dis­trac­tion and are admin­is­tered in dis­trac­tion-reduced envi­ron­ments. A clas­sic exam­ple of a test insen­si­tive to dis­trac­tion is the Wech­sler Mem­o­ry Scale (WMS). This task is gen­er­al­ly viewed as the sin­gle best mea­sure of mem­o­ry func­tion­ing. Test­ing nar­ra­tive ver­bal mem­o­ry with Para­graphs from the Wech­sler Mem­o­ry Scale, we found 86% of patients with fibromyal­gia behaved essen­tial­ly nor­mal­ly on this mea­sure of mem­o­ry that is atten­tion direct­ed and free of distraction.

By con­trast, large size deficits in mem­o­ry skills arose when a dis­tract­ing source of infor­ma­tion was added to sim­ple mea­sures of mem­o­ry. For exam­ple, the Audi­to­ry Con­so­nant Tri­gram (ACT) tracks mem­o­ry for a small amount of infor­ma­tion fol­low­ing dis­trac­tion peri­ods of either 9, 18 or 36 sec­onds. With no dis­trac­tion on the ACT, a small file of infor­ma­tion was ful­ly remem­bered. How­ev­er, fol­low­ing a dis­trac­tion of 9 sec­onds, the loss of infor­ma­tion was dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly large. The 9 sec­ond dis­trac­tion erased almost 58% of the same infor­ma­tion sug­gest­ing that even lim­it­ed dis­trac­tion harms recall of new infor­ma­tion. In fact, peo­ple with fibromyal­gia lost sim­ple infor­ma­tion at a rate that was almost three times greater than the nor­ma­tive sample.

In the aggre­gate, psy­cho­me­t­ric based evi­dence of mem­o­ry abnor­mal­i­ty was found in 82.6% of the cas­es employ­ing the ACT, pro­vid­ing robust cog­ni­tive doc­u­men­ta­tion of psy­cho­me­t­ric based cog­ni­tive loss in a large major­i­ty of fibromyal­gia patients. Inabil­i­ty to fil­ter the effects of dis­trac­tion may be one rea­son why new infor­ma­tion erodes so quick­ly in real life sit­u­a­tions. These find­ings might be tak­en to indi­cate that the abil­i­ty to han­dle the dis­trac­tions of dai­ly liv­ing may be weak­ened in FMS. Deficits of this mag­ni­tude can trans­late into large adverse effects on the abil­i­ty to func­tion in dai­ly living.

Dis­trac­tions are more than a nui­sance vari­able that cause the mind to wan­der. They are a vital part of life and cen­tral to an under­stand­ing of the cog­ni­tive under­pin­ning of why peo­ple with fibromyal­gia do not remem­ber, and why neu­ropsy­chol­o­gists must take dis­trac­tions from com­pet­ing tasks into account in their exam­i­na­tion. Tests bat­ter­ies, if not appro­pri­ate­ly con­sti­tut­ed, may miss the process­es that cause mem­o­ry to fal­ter in fibromyalgia.

A close exam­i­na­tion of test usage among neu­ropsy­chol­o­gists in the U.S doc­u­ments the neglect of dis­trac­tion in neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal mea­sures of mem­o­ry. In two recent sur­veys, not a sin­gle neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal test list­ed in the top 50 mea­sures pop­u­lar­ly employed by neu­ropsy­chol­o­gists mea­sures the inter­play between mem­o­ry and a source of dis­trac­tion that diverts atten­tion away from the pri­ma­ry task for a peri­od of time. The Audi­to­ry Con­so­nant Tri­gram was not ranked in the top 50 in either sur­vey. In both sur­veys, the Wech­sler Mem­o­ry Scale was the mea­sure most wide­ly used by neu­ropsy­chol­o­gists to assess mem­o­ry func­tion­ing in fibromyal­gia. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, it is also a mea­sure with seri­ous short­com­ings for assess­ing mem­o­ry com­plaints in fibromyal­gia. It entire­ly elim­i­nates sources of dis­trac­tion, which are so promi­nent in dai­ly recall of infor­ma­tion. Instead, it taps cog­ni­tive skills in FMS that are large­ly work­ing ade­quate­ly, there­by obscur­ing the very cog­ni­tive defi­cien­cies that are salient to their com­plaints. Peo­ple can have excel­lent mem­o­ry when iso­lat­ed in a dis­trac­tion free envi­ron­ment, and extreme­ly poor mem­o­ry when they must address a source of dis­trac­tion that divides attention.

Our on-going research shows that cog­ni­tive tests free of dis­trac­tion do not paint a full pic­ture of mem­o­ry func­tion­ing and helps to dis­pel doubts about mem­o­ry com­plaints in fibromyal­gia patients. It sug­gests that the typ­i­cal neu­ropsy­cho­log­i­cal bat­tery does not involve a fair mea­sure of the abil­i­ty to remem­ber in fibromyal­gia. When appro­pri­ate cog­ni­tive tests are admin­is­tered, FMS patients with mem­o­ry prob­lems dis­play sub­stan­tial psy­cho­me­t­ric based evi­dence of impair­ment. Rather than being at odds with FMS com­plaints, the find­ings com­pli­ment self-reports and show FMS appre­ci­a­tion of fail­ing mem­o­ry has a legit­i­mate basis. When mea­sures focus on “real life” mem­o­ry skills, mem­o­ry com­plaints and psy­cho­me­t­ric based evi­dence align nice­ly. It is only by employ­ing mea­sures that assess more rep­re­sen­ta­tive obsta­cles to remem­ber­ing that we can hope to fair­ly address the cog­ni­tive com­plaints of fibromyal­gia patients.

Ref­er­ence:
Leav­itt F, Katz RS. Dis­trac­tion as a Key Deter­mi­nant of Impaired Mem­o­ry in Fibromyal­gia. Jour­nal of Rheuma­tol­ogy (In Press).

We know that FMS is a neu­ro­log­i­cal dis­or­der that caus­es hyper­sen­si­ti­za­tion. Every­thing is much more intense to a per­son with FMS—a noise, a change in light­ing or air­flow, the way fab­ric feels against the skin, a smell (pleas­ant, unpleas­ant, or neu­tral) that wafts in on the breeze—all of it can be BIG, where­as some­one with FMS might not notice any of it. Even when we learn to con­scious­ly fil­ter it all out, the dis­trac­tions are there, tak­ing away pro­cess­ing cycles. 

The clos­est I can come to describ­ing the effect is being a par­ent. If a child is present, whether or not you are respon­si­ble for that child, any­body who is a par­ent or has exten­sive child­care expe­ri­ence is auto­mat­i­cal­ly tuned in to “where’s the kid? what is she doing? is she okay? why don’t I hear any­thing? what was that?” You hear too much, things are sus­pi­cious­ly quiet—you know. Some part of you is on alert on a deep lev­el. You are not able to go “off duty” because there is a pri­mal aware­ness that adults are respon­si­ble for chil­dren. It does­n’t mat­ter if the child is actu­al­ly in the ROOM or not—she’s there, and you know it.

As much as I adore my girl, and as much as I love spend­ing time with her, I’m not total­ly out of Mom­my Mode, even now that she’s a very respon­si­ble teenag­er, if she’s in the build­ing. If she’s else­where, in the care of some­one in whom I have implic­it trust, I can be Cyn­thia rather than Mommy.

Mom­my is not able to be whol­ly focused on any­thing else in the world—not writ­ing, study­ing, noth­ing. Maybe I’ll man­age med­i­ta­tion when the girl is grown and gone (but I doubt it). 

Fibro hyper­sen­si­tiv­i­ty is like that, so every­thing is dis­tract­ing, even when we aren’t aware of the dis­trac­tion. That leads to poor mem­o­ry, poor con­cen­tra­tion, slow­er mem­o­ry, hav­ing more trou­ble learn­ing new mate­r­i­al, and gen­er­al­ly poor cog­ni­tive pro­cess­ing com­pared to pre-fibro lev­els. Peo­ple who were func­tion­ing at very high lev­els pre-FMS might not show it much. It’s obvi­ous­ly going to be far more notice­able on days when pain and fatigue are par­tic­u­lar­ly bad — but there are def­i­nite­ly cog­ni­tive deficits.

I don’t think I’d qual­i­fy for Men­sa again if it required a re-test. Not that I’m inter­est­ed in rejoin­ing at the moment, but I’m glad they don’t insist that I prove that I’m still qualified 🙂

Cur­rent Mood: 🙂sat­is­fied
Cyn is Rick's wife, Katie's Mom, and Esther & Oliver's Mémé. She's also a professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top