Black Legislators Stall Marriage Amendment in Georgia

I find it inter­est­ing that I did­n’t see this sto­ry report­ed in the AJC first.

Black Leg­is­la­tors Stall Mar­riage Amend­ment in Georgia

(Empha­sis is mine.)
By ANDREW JACOBS

Pub­lished: March 3, 2004

ATLANTA, March 2 — Geor­gia’s head­long rush to block gay mar­riages through a con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment has been stalled, for the moment, by an unlike­ly group of leg­is­la­tors: black mem­bers of the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives, many of them church dea­cons and min­is­ters who already sup­port the state’s laws ban­ning same-sex marriage.

Last week, they pro­vid­ed 39 of 50 no votes and absten­tions that helped the mea­sure fall 3 votes short of the 120 need­ed for passage.

The bill, which requires a two-thirds major­i­ty to appear on the bal­lot this Novem­ber, may be rein­tro­duced in the Demo­c­ra­t­ic-con­trolled House as ear­ly as Thurs­day. The mea­sure has already passed the Sen­ate, which is dom­i­nat­ed by Repub­li­cans, despite no votes from all 10 black members.

“In my 30 years in the leg­is­la­ture, I don’t think I’ve seen a vote so close and so impas­sioned,” said Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Calvin Smyre, chair­man of the House Rules Com­mit­tee, who is black.

The bat­tle over gay mar­riage here has put African-Amer­i­can law­mak­ers in a dif­fi­cult posi­tion with vot­ers and placed them in stark con­trast to their white Demo­c­ra­t­ic col­leagues, most of whom have joined Repub­li­cans in call­ing for a con­sti­tu­tion­al bul­wark against same-sex marriage.

Many con­stituents, includ­ing their home­town church lead­ers, have been clam­or­ing for them to approve the mea­sure, but the state’s Leg­isla­tive Black Cau­cus has large­ly come to see it as den­i­grat­ing a minor­i­ty while play­ing into the hands of con­ser­v­a­tive Repub­li­cans seek­ing to spark a large turnout of their base in November.

“I’m a pas­tor and I don’t sup­port gay mar­riage, but I resent peo­ple play­ing polit­i­cal foot­ball with our reli­gious beliefs,” said Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Ron Sailor Jr., a Demo­c­rat whose sub­ur­ban Atlanta dis­trict con­tains some of the state’s largest and most con­ser­v­a­tive black church­es.

As near­ly two dozen states move to ban same-sex mar­riage through con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ments, the polit­i­cal dra­ma in Geor­gia offers a win­dow into how sim­i­lar bat­tles might play out. In the Mis­sis­sip­pi House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives, which passed a sim­i­lar bill on Mon­day, only 17 leg­is­la­tors vot­ed against the mea­sure, all of them black.

“At the nation­al lev­el and in states like Mass­a­chu­setts and Geor­gia, African-Amer­i­can lead­ers have been pret­ty clear in their oppo­si­tion to these kinds of con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ments,” said Seth Kil­bourn, nation­al field direc­tor for the Human Rights Cam­paign, a gay rights group in Wash­ing­ton. “No mat­ter how they feel about mar­riage for same-sex cou­ples, they don’t want to write into our gov­ern­ing doc­u­ments laws that treat one group of peo­ple dif­fer­ent from anoth­er. They’ve seen this coun­try go down that road before.”

In Geor­gia, a deeply reli­gious and social­ly con­ser­v­a­tive state that passed a law ban­ning same-sex mar­riage in 1996, the oppo­si­tion of so many black law­mak­ers was not expect­ed. Sadie Fields, chair­man of the Chris­t­ian Coali­tion of Geor­gia, said she was furi­ous when sev­er­al black rep­re­sen­ta­tives switched sides at the last minute on Thurs­day night.

“I think some of these leg­is­la­tors are going to have a lot to answer for come this fall,” Ms. Fields said. “If I was African-Amer­i­can, I would be furi­ous that homo­sex­u­als are com­par­ing what they want to do with civ­il rights.”

In inter­views with more than a dozen black leg­is­la­tors, most were reluc­tant to char­ac­ter­ize their posi­tion as a stand against dis­crim­i­na­tion. Like many of those who oppose a con­sti­tu­tion­al ban, Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Earnest Williams of Stone Moun­tain said com­par­isons between the strug­gle for black civ­il rights and the pur­suit of gay mar­riage were disingenuous.

“You just can’t equate sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion to racial dis­crim­i­na­tion,” Mr. Williams said. “You can make a choice of who you want in your bed­room, but you can’t choose your skin color.”

Even so, some who oppose gay mar­riage — and oppo­si­tion on that point was near­ly unan­i­mous — said the idea of amend­ing the Con­sti­tu­tion to restrict the aspi­ra­tions of a group of peo­ple was trou­bling. Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Geor­gan­na Sink­field of Atlanta cit­ed pre­vi­ous state laws that upheld slav­ery, cur­tailed vot­ing rights and out­lawed mar­riage between blacks and whites.

“What I see in this is hate,” Ms. Sink­field said, stand­ing out­side the ornate House cham­bers between votes. “I’m a Chris­t­ian, but if we put this in the Con­sti­tu­tion, what’s next? Peo­ple with dark hair? You’re open­ing the flood­gates for peo­ple to pro­mote their own prejudice.”

For the most part, black elect­ed offi­cials, at least pub­licly, have por­trayed their oppo­si­tion as a mat­ter of polit­i­cal prag­ma­tism. Con­ser­v­a­tive Repub­li­cans, they say, are using the issue as a wedge between Democ­rats and rur­al whites, and as a way to send reli­gious con­ser­v­a­tives to the vot­ing booths in November.

“This whole thing is designed to whip up a fren­zy to get peo­ple to the polls,” said Sen­a­tor Ed Har­bi­son, chair­man of the Geor­gia Leg­isla­tive Black Cau­cus. “We have to see this for what it real­ly is.”

In their lob­by­ing cam­paign, cau­cus lead­ers have told poten­tial defec­tors that a yes vote on the amend­ment could lead to a Repub­li­can takeover of the House and strip black Geor­gians of their voice in the Gen­er­al Assem­bly. Once firm­ly Demo­c­ra­t­ic, both the Sen­ate and the gov­er­nor­ship were lost to the Repub­li­cans two years ago. Every seat in the House and Sen­ate is up for elec­tion in November.

“If we’re a minor­i­ty in the House, we will have no pow­er. Zero,” said Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Tyrone Brooks, who heads the Geor­gia Asso­ci­a­tion of Black Elect­ed Offi­cials. “This is not about your per­son­al beliefs. It’s about a polit­i­cal ball­game the Repub­li­cans kicked off.”

Not all black law­mak­ers are against an amend­ment. There was one yes vote on Thurs­day, and eight law­mak­ers stayed away from the cham­bers that evening. In recent days, as the pres­sure has mount­ed, a hand­ful of African-Amer­i­cans have begun to waver.

Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Sharon Beasley-Teague of Atlanta said she did not see the need for an amend­ment but the bar­rage of protests, includ­ing a large demon­stra­tion at the Capi­tol on Mon­day, helped change her mind.

“You can’t even leave a mes­sage at my office, the voice mail is so jammed with peo­ple say­ing it’s Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve,” she said.

I do believe I’m going to send some mes­sages thank­ing them.

Cur­rent Mood: 🙂impressed
Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top