A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Where do first amendment rights go when you enter a courtroom?

I’m not even talk­ing about the rights of defend­ents or plain­tiffs, but those of peo­ple who are oth­er­wise present in a court­room who aren’t being dis­rup­tive. How much con­trol do judges actu­al­ly need in order to main­tain order in the court­room? At what point are they sim­ply being pet­ty tyrants?

I don’t have a prob­lem with judges insist­ing that peo­ple not use cell­phones or lis­ten to music. But when they start arrest­ing peo­ple in the court­room based on their cloth­ing, cloth­ing that is obvi­ous­ly what these peo­ple wear on an every­day basis and not cho­sen to cause a prob­lem, that’s ridicu­lous.

Accord­ing to the Chica­go Tri­bune, that’s exact­ly what hap­pened to 20-year-old Jen­nifer LaPen­ta of Round Lake (Illi­nois, I pre­sume) this past week. She wore a t‑shirt to the gym to work out. After­wards (?), a friend asked LaPen­ta to dri­ve the friend to the cour­t­house to pay some minor traf­fic tick­ets, so LaPen­ta did so. Short­ly after the two sat down in the court­room, Lake Coun­ty Asso­ciate Judge Helen Rozen­berg sum­moned LaPen­ta to the bench and asked her if she thought her t‑shirt was appro­pri­ate attire.

What was the hor­ri­bly offen­sive mes­sage on her shirt? “I have the pussy, so I make the rules.”

LaPen­ta told the judge that she did­n’t con­sid­er it offen­sive, but offered to change her shirt. Instead, the judge had the girl arrest­ed and jailed for 48 hours for con­tempt of court.

Note that nobody said a word to the girl before she entered the court­room about her shirt. Every time I’ve ever entered a cour­t­house, there have been bailiffs or deputies or some such look­ing every­body over there, and then again at every entrance to the actu­al court­rooms. If the shirt was so offen­sive, why did­n’t they say some­thing then? Why did­n’t the judge sim­ply accept the girl’s offer to change her shirt, or allow her to leave the court­room?

I’ll give you that the shirt is tacky and taste­less. I would­n’t wear it. I would hope that my daugh­ter would have too much class to wear it, and would have far more com­mon sense than to enter a court­room wear­ing it. If LaPen­ta had a lick of com­mon sense, she would have wait­ed out­side the court­room, or changed into anoth­er shirt, rather than enter­ing any court­room in such attire. If nei­ther she nor her friend gave a momen­t’s thought to the mat­ter, I can only assume that they fre­quent­ly wear such charm­ing state­ments on their per­sons. Still, they are well with­in their first amend­ment rights to do so, wher­ev­er they may be inside the Unit­ed States, as far as I under­stand things. Except, it appears, inside court­rooms?

It should not be with­in any judge’s pow­er to exer­cise their pow­ers in such a pet­ty way. The shirt was tacky, but it did no actu­al harm to any­one. I find peo­ple who wear brown and gray togeth­er far more dis­tress­ing, but I’ve yet to see any­one sug­gest that it be a crim­i­nal offense. The judi­cia­ry is not empow­ered to enforce stan­dards of taste. I real­ize that this sit­u­a­tion is only one of the more ludi­crous exam­ples of judi­cial irre­spon­si­bil­i­ty, but the obvi­ous ones are low-hang­ing fruit.

Thanks to Dr. Mar­ty Klein’s Sex­u­al Intel­li­gence Newslet­ter for the lead to the news item.

3 comments to Where do first amendment rights go when you enter a courtroom?

Leave a Reply