And Another Death That’ll Be Used to Justify More Gun Control

Woodard said she had­n’t known there was a gun in the house, and that she had warned her chil­dren in the past about them. She said gun own­ers need to make sure weapons don’t fall into the hands of children.

I’m all for respon­si­ble gun own­er­ship, and the creep who owned the gun cer­tain­ly did­n’t both­er secur­ing it—but since he owned it ille­gal­ly, I’m not too surprised. 

Please note: There are no gun con­trol laws that would have pre­vent­ed this death. The world will not be made safer by pass­ing more leg­is­la­tion. Crim­i­nals don’t wor­ry about laws, by definition.

Respon­si­ble par­ent­ing is what would have made the biggest dif­fer­ence in those kids’ lives. Say, Mom­ma not hang­ing out with con­vict­ed felons? Oh, what a con­cept! How lim­it­ing! How about Mom­ma tak­ing respon­si­bil­i­ty for ASKING about guns in the home? Or hav­ing giv­en her kids more edu­ca­tion than “don’t touch guns”?


Edit: Wow. I sent essen­tial­ly the same text as this post to the AJC as a let­ter to the edi­tor. I just got a call ask­ing me to expand that to 400 words to serve as a coun­ter­point to an edi­to­r­i­al they’re run­ning on the top­ic. By 3 pm today.

Cur­rent Mood: 😡angry
Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top