LJ

Question About the Constitution

Happy Birth­day star­rchilde!

I need to get to bed ear­li­er tonight. I resent wak­ing so late and hav­ing so much of the day gone!

I’m wondering—if one con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment vio­lates some­thing that’s already in the con­sti­tu­tion, can the amend­ment be struck down by the Supreme Court?

For instance, the 14th amend­ment says:
Sec­tion 1. All per­sons born or nat­u­ral­ized in the Unit­ed States, and sub­ject to the juris­dic­tion there­of, are cit­i­zens of the Unit­ed States and of the state where­in they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the priv­i­leges or immu­ni­ties of cit­i­zens of the Unit­ed States; nor shall any state deprive any per­son of life, lib­er­ty, or prop­er­ty, with­out due process of law; nor deny to any per­son with­in its juris­dic­tion the equal pro­tec­tion of the laws.

The pro­posed con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment ban­ning same-sex mar­riages would deny equal pro­tec­tion under the law to those who want to mar­ry some­one of the same sex. 

So which one would be right? Would they strike out that part of the 14th amend­ment, or alter it to say “except queer peo­ple,” or what?

Cur­rent Mood: 😕curi­ous
Category: LJ
Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top