Stop Worrying About It!

Our Obses­sion With Thin­ness Is Mak­ing Us Fat
By Paul Campos
Paul Cam­pos, a pro­fes­sor of law at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Col­orado, is the author of the forth­com­ing book The Last Amer­i­can Diet.
July 17, 2002

(Note: I’m going to repro­duce the arti­cle here because I don’t know how long it’ll stay available.)

Recent con­tro­ver­sies regard­ing diet and health on the one hand, and hor­mone ther­a­py for women on the oth­er, pro­vide excel­lent exam­ples of good and bad media cov­er­age of pub­lic health issues. 

The sto­ries regard­ing the risks and ben­e­fits of hor­mone ther­a­py have been intel­li­gent­ly writ­ten, reflect­ing a bal­anced view of a dif­fi­cult sci­en­tif­ic and med­ical issue. The sto­ries on var­i­ous fad diets and the sup­posed “obe­si­ty cri­sis,” by con­trast, have exem­pli­fied the medi­a’s unwill­ing­ness to ques­tion the most brazen pro­pa­gan­da of the weight-loss indus­try and its many allies in both the gov­ern­ment and the med­ical establishment.

After research­ing the sub­ject for sev­er­al years, it’s become clear to me that, in the world of pub­lic health pol­i­cy, all ideas relat­ing to weight and health are equal­ly wel­come, so long as they do not devi­ate in any way from the fun­da­men­tal axioms of the war on fat. 

These are that fat is a sig­nif­i­cant health risk, that “fat” peo­ple will be health­i­er if they lose weight, and that “fat” peo­ple can be expect­ed to become thin and stay that way by dieting. 

In fact, the evi­dence for all three of these propo­si­tions is extra­or­di­nar­i­ly slender—not that you would ever get a hint of this from 99.5 per­cent of what the mass media prints and broad­casts on the subject.

I place the word “fat” in quo­ta­tion marks because the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment says that a woman of aver­age height (defined as 5‑feet-4-inch­es tall) is “fat” if she weighs 145 pounds. Many obe­si­ty researchers will tell you that this insane def­i­n­i­tion is com­plete­ly unsup­port­ed by the med­ical lit­er­a­ture. Rather, it is a prod­uct of a nation­al obses­sion with thin­ness that is in large part respon­si­ble for caus­ing the very fat explo­sion we so fear and loathe. 

Cur­rent­ly, an esti­mat­ed 120 mil­lion Amer­i­cans are on some sort of diet. This also hap­pens to be almost exact­ly the same num­ber of Amer­i­cans the gov­ern­ment cat­e­go­rizes as either “over­weight” or “obese.” That is not a coincidence.

Part of the prob­lem is that there are many facts about Amer­i­ca’s war on fat that rarely find their way into the media.

Var­i­ous med­ical stud­ies show that, for instance, peo­ple who inten­tion­al­ly restrict their caloric intake invari­ably end up, on aver­age, weigh­ing more than peo­ple of sim­i­lar ini­tial weight who don’t. Could Amer­i­ca’s $50-bil­lion-per-year weight-loss indus­try be help­ing to cause the very “dis­ease” it claims to cure?

Amer­i­cans get 20-per­cent few­er calo­ries from fat than we did a gen­er­a­tion ago—and yet we weigh, on aver­age, 15 pounds more than we did in 1982, accord­ing to data from the Unit­ed States Depart­ment of Agri­cul­ture and the Nation­al Insti­tutes of Health. The rea­son, on one lev­el, is quite sim­ple: Fat itself does­n’t make peo­ple fat—food does.

Con­sid­er the storm of con­tro­ver­sy about a July 7 New York Times Mag­a­zine arti­cle argu­ing that per­haps diet guru Robert Atkins was right after all when he claimed Amer­i­cans would be slim­mer if they ate stacks of cheese­burg­ers with­out buns. To the Amer­i­can med­ical estab­lish­ment, this always sound­ed far too good to be true. So in the spir­it of sci­en­tif­ic inquiry, they decid­ed to dis­miss Atkins’ claims with­out both­er­ing to test them first. 

In fact, the multi­bil­lion-dol­lar low-fat food indus­try has flour­ished by cre­at­ing a nation of dieters who spend their lives eat­ing food that does not sat­is­fy their appetites and, indeed by its nature, can­not do so. This is a pre­scrip­tion for cre­at­ing com­pul­sive snack­ers and binge eaters, which is pre­cise­ly what we have become. Accord­ing to “Eat Fat” author Richard Klein, Amer­i­cans aver­age 20 “food con­tacts” a day. He goes on to point out that the French, who eat a diet with a 50 per­cent high­er-fat con­tent and are much thin­ner, aver­age sev­en food encoun­ters a day.

Phys­i­cal-activ­i­ty lev­els are bet­ter pre­dic­tors of health than body mass: As long-term stud­ies at Dal­las’ Coop­er Insti­tute show, “over­weight” active peo­ple are far health­i­er than thin seden­tary ones and just as healthy as their thin active counterparts.

We’re a nation that makes a large per­cent­age of its cit­i­zens feel ter­ri­ble about their fail­ure to con­form to an absurd­ly thin cul­tur­al ide­al. The weight-loss indus­try prof­its from encour­ag­ing these peo­ple to engage in behavior—obsessing about weight, in gen­er­al, and diet­ing, in particular—that caus­es them to become much fat­ter than they would be otherwise. 

And the gov­ern­ment exac­er­bates this neu­rot­ic sit­u­a­tion by issu­ing increas­ing­ly hys­ter­i­cal pro­nounce­ments, demand­ing that Amer­i­cans keep doing the very things that have been mak­ing them fat but to do them “right” this time.

If his­to­ry is any guide, Amer­i­cans who eat food that sat­is­fies them, who nev­er diet and who focus on what actu­al­ly mat­ters to health—that is, being phys­i­cal­ly active—will be hap­pi­er, health­i­er and thinner.

All of this is obscured by the medi­a’s uncrit­i­cal rep­e­ti­tion of the weight-loss indus­try’s pro­pa­gan­da. In oth­er words, the way to win the war on fat is not to fight it in the first place.
Copy­right © 2002, News­day, Inc. 

Cyn is a proud Mommy & Mémé, professional geek, avid reader, fledgling coder, enthusiastic gamer (TTRPGs), occasional singer, and devoted stitcher.
Posts created 4241

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top