Enemy of Entropy

Archive for Relationships

Maybe It Isn’t the Flu

6 March 2010, 11:50 pm. Comments Off. Filed under Family, Fun, Health, Reading, Relationships.

Katie seems to be feel­ing a bit bet­ter. She slept through most of the day, and just got up a few min­utes ago (right at the end of my and Sam’s date) feel­ing like she could eat some­thing. Solid food, even! That’s progress. Since she didn’t have any antivi­rals, I don’t think this was really the flu. She should still be much sicker if it was. I’m not at all unhappy about that. Read on…

What was her name?

5 August 2009, 4:52 pm. 3 Comments. Filed under Relationships.

While I was read­ing friends’ updates at Face­book today, some­thing reminded me of a girl I knew back in high school. She went to my high school, and as far as I know she was in my grad­u­at­ing class. I didn’t meet her at school, though, and I don’t think our paths crossed there. I knew her from church. She intro­duced me to the guy who became my first hus­band (who she had dated in the recent past).

Now I’m dri­ving myself nuts, because I absolutely can­not remem­ber her name! I can see her face, plain as day. I remem­ber that she had a some­what uncom­mon last name. I think she had an older brother who had been a big deal on the foot­ball team a year or three ahead of us. Why can’t I remem­ber her name?

I’m really bad with names, hon­estly. A Face­book appli­ca­tion was ask­ing me to ver­ify 130+ peo­ple as high school class­mates, and truly, I didn’t rec­og­nize many of them at all. I didn’t remem­ber most of the peo­ple I saw at our five year reunion. After 25 years? I’m hopeless.

Maybe I should get my old year­books out and look at Face­book and the year­books at the same time. I don’t know that I’d be any bet­ter that way, either. I need con­text for most peo­ple — not just a face and a name, but also some­thing like “that guy from home­room who was always draw­ing cars in his note­books” or “that soprano who bathed in Emer­aude” or “the cute geeky drum­mer who sel­dom made eye con­tact with any­body” (okay, him I’d rec­og­nize, and I do remem­ber his name).

Our year­books aren’t the sort that listed people’s activ­i­ties with their pho­tos. You would have to search through all the activ­ity list­ings to find out who did what, which is much more annoying.

Anniversary!

12 September 2008, 4:16 pm. 2 Comments. Filed under Relationships.

Ten years ago today, Sam took me out on our first “real” date (as in, with­out the kids or any­one else). Thank you, love. Here’s to many more decades!

TotD: Emma Goldman on Love

8 July 2008, 3:48 am. 3 Comments. Filed under Love, Relationships, Thought of the Day.

Love, the strongest and deep­est ele­ment in all life, the har­bin­ger of hope, of joy, of ecstasy; love, the defier of all laws, of all con­ven­tions; love, the freest, the most pow­er­ful molder of human des­tiny; how can such an all-​​compelling force be syn­ony­mous with that poor lit­tle State and Church-​​begotten weed, marriage?

Free love? As if love is any­thing but free! Man has bought brains, but all the mil­lions in the world have failed to buy love. Man has sub­dued bod­ies, but all the power on earth has been unable to sub­due love. Man has con­quered whole nations, but all his armies could not con­quer love. Man has chained and fet­tered the spirit, but he has been utterly help­less before love. High on a throne, with all the splen­dor and pomp his gold can com­mand, man is yet poor and des­o­late, if love passes him by. And if it stays, the poor­est hovel is radi­ant with warmth, with life and color. Thus love has the magic power to make of a beg­gar a king. Yes, love is free; it can dwell in no other atmosphere.

Anarchism and Other EssaysEmma Gold­man, “Mar­riage and Love,” Anar­chism and Other Essays (1911)

TotD: Carter Heyward on Love

29 June 2008, 11:57 pm. 1 Comment. Filed under Relationships, Thought of the Day.

Carter Hey­ward:

Love, like truth and beauty, is con­crete. Love is not fun­da­men­tally a sweet feel­ing; not, at heart, a mat­ter of sen­ti­ment, attach­ment, or being “drawn toward.” Love is active, effec­tive, a mat­ter of mak­ing rec­i­p­ro­cal and mutu­ally ben­e­fi­cial rela­tion with one’s friends and ene­mies. Love cre­ates right­eous­ness, or jus­tice, here on earth. To make love is to make jus­tice. As advo­cates and activists for jus­tice know, lov­ing involves strug­gle, resis­tance, risk. Peo­ple work­ing today on behalf of women, blacks, les­bians and gay men, the aging, the poor in this coun­try and else­where know that mak­ing jus­tice is not a warm, fuzzy expe­ri­ence. I think also that sex­ual lovers and good friends know that the most com­pelling rela­tion­ships demand hard work, patience, and a will­ing­ness to endure ten­sions and anx­i­ety in cre­at­ing mutu­ally empow­er­ing bonds.

For this rea­son lov­ing involves com­mit­ment. We are not auto­matic lovers of self, oth­ers, world, or God. Love does not just hap­pen. We are not love machines, pup­pets on the strings of a deity called “love.” Love is a choice – not sim­ply, or nec­es­sar­ily, a ratio­nal choice, but rather a will­ing­ness to be present to oth­ers with­out pre­tense or guile. Love is a con­ver­sion to human­ity – a will­ing­ness to par­tic­i­pate with oth­ers in the heal­ing of a bro­ken world and bro­ken lives. Love is the choice to expe­ri­ence life as a mem­ber of the human fam­ily, a part­ner in the dance of life, rather than as an alien in the world or as a deity above the world, aloof and apart from human flesh.

 

Powered by WebRing.