Enemy of Entropy

Archive for Reading

Review: Walking Dead by C.E. Murphy

7 March 2010, 11:00 am. No Comments. Filed under Reading.

Walking Dead (Walker Papers, #4) Walk­ing Dead by C.E. Mur­phy


My rat­ing: 4 of 5 stars
I’ve enjoyed the other Walker Papers nov­els, but Walk­ing Dead def­i­nitely showed more depth and matu­rity than the ear­lier vol­umes. Both the author and her lead char­ac­ter have grown very nicely. Joanne is far from per­fect, but she doesn’t make the same mis­takes over and over again, which is a pet peeve of mine and occurs all too often in some other authors works. (There’s con­sis­tency, and then there’s refus­ing to learn from mis­takes to the extent that I have to believe that a char­ac­ter is too stu­pid to live.) As for the author, it’s incred­i­bly refresh­ing to read a series that does not fall into the all-​​too-​​familiar para­nor­mal romance formula!

Another thing I enjoy about this series is that hero­ine Joanne has a sup­port­ing ensem­ble of friends and cowork­ers who have their own tal­ents and foibles, includ­ing a delight­ful mar­ried cou­ple, a sexy father fig­ure (who isn’t related to any­one we’ve met so far), and an even sex­ier boss. This time around we were treated to the return of a char­ac­ter Joanne res­cued in an ear­lier vol­ume who has grown into some of her own ass-​​kicking abilities.

There is a thread that ties all of the Walker Papers together, but C.E. Mur­phy is keep­ing things fresh enough that I, at least, am not get­ting bored. I would, how­ever, cau­tion that this is a series that is best read com­pletely and in order. I began read­ing one of the nov­els with­out real­iz­ing that there had been a novella pub­lished between it and the pre­vi­ous one, and found myself well and truly con­fused. Walk­ing Dead def­i­nitely is not a good start­ing point for the series! While a new reader wouldn’t nec­es­sar­ily be com­pletely lost, she would miss far too many details to get all the juice out of this book.

View all my reviews »

Maybe It Isn’t the Flu

6 March 2010, 11:50 pm. No Comments. Filed under Family, Fun, Health, Reading, Relationships.

Katie seems to be feel­ing a bit bet­ter. She slept through most of the day, and just got up a few min­utes ago (right at the end of my and Sam’s date) feel­ing like she could eat some­thing. Solid food, even! That’s progress. Since she didn’t have any antivi­rals, I don’t think this was really the flu. She should still be much sicker if it was. I’m not at all unhappy about that. Read on…

Book Review: By Blood We Live

3 March 2010, 8:00 am. No Comments. Filed under Reading.

By Blood We Live By Blood We Live by John Joseph Adams

My rat­ing: 4 of 5 stars
This thing is an enor­mous tome! I don’t know if it has been released in hard­back or not, but if it has, that ver­sion has to be anchor-​​worthy. I requested it from the library because Eliz­a­beth Bear and Sarah Mon­ette had sto­ries in it, and I’ll read pretty much any­thing either of those wor­thies pub­lish. I didn’t expect to care for most of the rest, and didn’t plan to do much more than flip through them.
Read on…

Review: A Free Man of Color

2 March 2010, 8:00 am. 2 Comments. Filed under Reading.

A Free Man of Color (Benjamin January, Book 1) A Free Man of Color by Bar­bara Hambly

My rat­ing: 4 of 5 stars
His­tor­i­cal fic­tion isn’t my favorite genre, but I’m much more will­ing to read it when it’s mixed with mys­tery. I’ve read some of Hambly’s work before and know her to be a fine writer, and I’d read good reviews of this series by peo­ple I respect, so I decided to give it a whirl.
Read on…

I’m Feeling Better!

19 February 2010, 12:04 am. 1 Comment. Filed under Health, Movies, Reading.

Cur­rent Mood:Cool emoticon Cool

(I think I’ve already used “Not Dead Yet” as a title, and I really don’t like to be too repet­i­tive.) I haven’t been post­ing much, and it isn’t really because I haven’t had any­thing at all to say. In fact, I’ve repeat­edly started to write posts. In fact, I’ve fin­ished writ­ing some posts — but each time, I’ve been side­tracked by the fact that the bit of geek magic that makes my words post here and to my LJ account is bro­ken. I did a cou­ple of posts by hand, but that’s inel­e­gant. Hence, the pub­lic has been deprived of my wis­dom. There, there now. It will be all right. Truly.

I received a note from an old friend here today. I’m try­ing to remem­ber how long it’s been since we were in touch — def­i­nitely more than a decade, but 12 years? 13? Time does fly. It will be inter­est­ing to hear how his life is these days.

Noth­ing earth-​​shattering to tell, hon­estly. I can’t truly remem­ber what I have and haven’t shared with the world at large, which often seems to be nar­rowed down to Sam, Katie, and the merry-​​go-​​round of health pro­fes­sion­als I get to see. Well, there are also the myr­iad per­sons who pop­u­late Katie’s social life, who I’ve given up enu­mer­at­ing. I think it speaks well for her that while there are fre­quent new faces, few of them ever leave. It makes it dif­fi­cult for me to keep up with them because there are so many! I know and have reg­u­lar con­tact with lots of peo­ple, and of course I value the con­tact we have online, but I don’t often get to see you with my own eyes and hug you with my own arms, and I am a tac­tile per­son at heart.

I’ve logged on to Sec­ond Life again a cou­ple of times. Sam has returned to reg­u­lar use of it. Voice chat does not make any­thing eas­ier for me there. In fact, it’s a bit worse, because I can’t go back and catch what I’ve missed in the logs. Sam did mar­velous work (thank you, love!) in chang­ing my avatar for me so that she looks far more real­is­tic, which I greatly pre­fer. I hate the whole porn star look that most females sport in SL. For one thing, it’s damned bor­ing. For another, I feel that it’s ridicu­lously dis­hon­est. Yes, I sup­pose one could just look at it as a fan­tasy life, but I don’t really fan­ta­size about look­ing that way, so it doesn’t do a thing for me. The whole avatar busi­ness is silly, for me. I’d rather just com­mu­ni­cate, with­out play­ing around with dolls. But obvi­ously, I’m in the minority.

I’ve been read­ing, of course. I read the Kathy Reichs books on which the TV series Bones is based. I enjoy both, or I wouldn’t have read the whole series (obvi­ously), but they have very lit­tle in com­mon other than the fact that the main char­ac­ter is named Tem­per­ance Bren­nan and she is a foren­sic anthro­pol­o­gist. The books’ Bren­nan is in her 40s (mid to late, I think — she has a daugh­ter in her 20s), is almost divorced, and splits her time between North Car­olina and Mon­treal. She con­sults with law enforce­ment in both juris­dic­tions. Her per­son­al­ity and back­ground are com­pletely dis­sim­i­lar to the TV Tem­per­ance (played by Emily Deschanel), who lives in the D.C. area and works at the Jef­fer­son Insti­tute, backed by Agent Booth of the F.B.I. I don’t recall hear­ing Temperance’s age, but IMDB says she was born in 1976, which would make her more than a decade younger than the books’ hero­ine. I’m not ter­ri­ble sur­prised to see that there’s at least one book out based on the tele­vi­sion ver­sion, authored by Max Allan Collins (I think, I’m not feel­ing like look­ing that up at the moment). There’s also far less humor in the books, which are much darker in gen­eral. If pushed, I’d have to say that I pre­fer the tele­vi­sion series a bit, but both ver­sions are val­lid for what they are.

I’m get­ting new glasses! I found some frames I like on eBay, of all places, so they’re in the mail. When they arrive I’ll order lenses to go in them. Since they’ll be my first bifo­cals, I fig­ure I shouldn’t try order­ing the lenses online for the first time, as well.

I might even try con­tacts again. I had plugs put in my tear ducts, which along with eye drops will hope­fully help resolve the dry eyes prob­lem enough to try them. 1 If that isn’t enough, I’m start­ing allergy shots again in a cou­ple of weeks, and the aller­gist insists that if I do the shots faith­fully twice a week my aller­gies will improve within three to six months, in which time I will try con­tacts yet again. And I’m told that there are contact-​​safe anti-​​allergen eye­drops now, too — when I was wear­ing lenses years ago, I had one eye doc­tor who would mix up some of those espe­cially for me, and when he moved out of state I was out of luck and couldn’t tol­er­ate the lenses any more. I miss periph­eral vision!

Sam and I watched the movie Julie & Julia last month (I think? I’ve gone from hav­ing no sense of time in the minutes/​hours sense to hav­ing no sense of days, weeks, and months!). I had noticed it as some­thing he might enjoy, so I put it in the Net­flix queue. As it turned out, we both enjoyed it greatly. It is a movie about food, but it’s also a story about two won­der­ful cou­ples, and about a writer’s process, and Julia Child, who I already knew to be a fas­ci­nat­ing woman (and about whom I’d still love to know more). It’s a dif­fi­cult movie to watch just as I’d given up sugar and gone mod­er­ately low-​​carbohydrate, though!


1 Sjogren’s syn­drome, I do not love you.

 

Powered by WebRing.