Enemy of Entropy

Archive for Civil Rights

Oh, he was obviously such a terrorist!

12 December 2009, 12:03 am. Comments Off. Filed under Civil Rights.

Dr Peter Watts, Cana­dian sci­ence fic­tion writer, beaten and arrested at US bor­der
Obvi­ously, sci­ence fic­tion writ­ers are scary peo­ple. And his rea­son for being in Nebraska in the first place (help­ing a friend move) was highly ques­tion­able, so it makes total sense that the bor­der patrol would search his vehi­cle. Get­ting out of the car to ask a ques­tion was obvi­ously a ter­ror­ist act, so the bor­der batrol beat him, pep­per sprayed him, and threw him in jail. After his wife paid his bail, they tossed him out in his shirt sleeves (obvi­ously, his coat had to be impounded along with his car, com­puter, and other belong­ings as a threat to national secu­rity) in the mid­dle of the night, after charg­ing him with a felony, claim­ing that he struck a fed­eral offi­cer (both the author and the pas­sen­ger in his car state that never hap­pened). Now the man has to return from his home in Canada to face felony charges in Michigan.

Why make an exception for rape and incest?

4 December 2009, 6:25 am. 7 Comments. Filed under Civil Rights, Sex, politics.

I always look for­ward to Dr. Marty Klein’s Sex­ual Intel­li­gence newslet­ters, so I was tick­led to see one in my inbox today. But one of the head­lines took me by sur­prise: End Rape & Incest Excep­tions to Stu­pak Abor­tion Ban. Dr. Klein always has excel­lent analy­ses, and this one is no exception.

If you’re against repro­duc­tive choice for so-​​called “moral rea­sons” (as if any­one get­ting an abor­tion or sup­port­ing its legal­ity isn’t “moral”), be con­sis­tent. If killing a fetus or even a fer­til­ized egg wan­der­ing around a woman’s body is the same as killing a per­son (the posi­tion of every anti-​​choice activist), why should it mat­ter how the fetus or fer­til­ized egg got there? Why is a fetus’ right to live dimin­ished because its father was a rapist or a sadist? After all, we don’t say the chil­dren of such men have fewer rights than other children.

Stupak is back! Time to call your legislators again!

3 December 2009, 7:31 am. 1 Comment. Filed under Civil Rights, politics.

Cur­rent Mood:Angry emoticon Angry

This time it’s in the Sen­ate, folks. In case you just crawled out from under a rock, I’m talk­ing about the Stupak-​​Pitts amend­ment to the Afford­able Health Care for Amer­ica Act that was orig­i­nally intro­duced in the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives by Demo­c­ra­tic Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Bart Stu­pak of Michi­gan and Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Joseph Pitts of Penn­syl­va­nia, along with a long list of Con­gressper­sons. The bill tried to keep any fed­eral funds from being used to pay for an abor­tion, but was also worded in such a way that it would have pro­hib­ited women from pur­chas­ing pri­vate cov­er­age to cover abor­tions. That’s a ridicu­lous restric­tion on the repro­duc­tive free­dom of every woman who needs health care, and an even fur­ther eco­nomic restric­tion on what pri­vate cit­i­zens can pur­chase with their own funds. Women would be los­ing cov­er­age they have now!

The let­ter I sent to my Sen­a­tors last month was, like every­thing I send to Sen­a­tor Isak­son, not read as far as I could tell, because his office just responded with a form let­ter bab­bling about his reli­gious beliefs. That’s a bit bet­ter than Sen­a­tor Cham­b­liss’ office, at least, which doesn’t even do that much. Still, that form let­ter was some­thing of a straw break­ing this par­tic­u­lar camel’s back, and it inspired me to write another let­ter back to Sen­a­tor Isak­son, one that he hasn’t responded to at all. I’m not ter­ri­bly sur­prised, as I asked that he not respond at all if his only response was going to be another form let­ter. Still, writ­ing it pre­pared me, to a cer­tain extent, to respond to the alert going out about the renewed Stu­pak amend­ment, which is why I men­tion it here.

Read on…

YAY!

17 May 2009, 3:45 am. 1 Comment. Filed under Civil Rights, Health.

Cur­rent Mood:Esctatic emoticon Esctatic

We were fairly sure of this right after I finally had my Social Secu­rity hear­ing last month based on the very pos­i­tive state­ments from the judge, but I didn’t want to jinx any­thing. We got the offi­cial let­ter in the mail today, say­ing that the deci­sion was “fully favor­able!” SQUEE!

It will still take some time for that deci­sion to bounce around the bureau­cracy and get monthly pay­ments started, much less get the back pay from the SSA. Because the onset date was years ago, I should be eli­gi­ble for Medicare right away, but I’ll need to talk to the attor­ney about that on Monday.

I really needed some good news, so the tim­ing is marvelous.

This process has been an insane endurance con­test. The fact that the SSA has been absolutely obstruc­tion­ist through­out (and I know my expe­ri­ence is far from unique!) is ridicu­lous. The sys­tem demands that peo­ple who are most in need of help are least likely to get it in any timely fash­ion, because it takes so much per­sis­tence, jar­gon, and inside knowl­edge to get any­where. If you can do all those forms and gather all the records and so on by your­self, I don’t know that you should count as dis­abled! Even peo­ple with good sup­port in other ways don’t always have some­one will­ing, able, and per­sis­tent who can and will spend the hours and hours of time to push a claim through.

I started the fil­ing process for one rea­son: I needed sta­ble access to health­care so that I could get well enough to go back to work. Five years down the line, I’m not at all sure that I will be able to return to work, because my health has dete­ri­o­rated so much that it may not be pos­si­ble to get back to an “abled” state. How many years of pro­duc­tive lives are being in the U.S. wasted for lack access to healthcare?

I get annoyed every time I hear a talk­ing head refer to plans to “insure” every­one. That isn’t what we need! Plenty of peo­ple have health insur­ance and still don’t get the actual health care they need because they can’t afford the co-​​pays, or the insurer won’t cover a par­tic­u­lar drug or ther­apy, or there are pre-​​existing con­di­tion prob­lems, or…

We need health care. Not divided up by age (this for kids, that for seniors, some­thing else for work­ing age peo­ple, oh, right, the dis­abled here) by uni­ver­sal car, the same care for every­one, for the whole body, cra­dle to grave. (Who ever decided that eyes and teeth should be sep­a­rated out, any­way? That’s stupid.)

I read an art­cle about San Francisco’s health pro­gram last week – if I can find a link I’ll add it later. It does just what I described, from what that arti­cle says. I don’t know how much it costs to join, but appar­ently there’s a lot of out­reach to peo­ple who are oth­er­wise unin­sured. There are no pre-​​existing conditions.

Does any­one know of pro­grams like San Francisco’s else­where in the U.S.?

Cur­rent Mood: (excited) excited

WTF? Georgia Senate Threatens to Secede!

16 April 2009, 7:23 pm. 3 Comments. Filed under Civil Rights, News.

Cur­rent Mood:Angry emoticon Angry

Geor­gia Sen­ate threat­ens dis­man­tling of USA
They really did, by a vote of 43 – 1. On April 1, but it wasn’t an April Fool’s joke.

The res­o­lu­tion goes on to endorse the the­ory that states have the right to abridge con­sti­tu­tional free­doms of reli­gion, press and speech. Accord­ing to the res­o­lu­tion, it is up to the states to decide “how far the licen­tious­ness of speech and of the press may be abridged.”
(snip)
Finally, the res­o­lu­tion states that if Con­gress, the pres­i­dent or fed­eral courts take any action that exceeds their con­sti­tu­tional pow­ers, the Con­sti­tu­tion is ren­dered null and void and the United States of Amer­ica is offi­cially dis­banded. As an exam­ple, the res­o­lu­tion specif­i­cally states that if the fed­eral gov­ern­ment enacts “pro­hi­bi­tions of type or quan­tity of arms or ammu­ni­tion,” the coun­try is disbanded.

You bet­ter believe that I’m writ­ing to our state sen­a­tor right away. Yes, this non­sense was slipped in on day 39 of the 40 day leg­isla­tive ses­sion, but that is absolutely no excuse. Our rep­re­sen­ta­tives have no busi­ness vot­ing for any­thing they haven’t thor­oughly read, under­stood, and debated. That’s their job!

Yet another rea­son I don’t want to live in Geor­gia any more. I seri­ously think this is a back­lash against our elec­tion of a black Demo­c­rat to the pres­i­dency. I’m look­ing at blue states now.

 

Powered by WebRing.